Vandana Balakrishnan, Saraswathy Lakshmiammal, Pillai Gowrikutty Krishna Suseeladevi, Sunadaram Karimassery Ramaiyer, Kumar Harish
Department of Physiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, India.
Int J Yoga. 2011 Jul;4(2):64-70. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.85487.
Relaxation techniques like meditation have been found to be beneficial in reducing stress.
The aim was to find out the effect of the Integrated Amrita Meditation (IAM) technique on the response to life changes.
The IAM technique, progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) technique, and the Life Changes Questionnaire (LCQ) were used. LCQ was culturally adapted to the Indian population. One hundred and fifty subjects were randomized into IAM, PMR, and Control groups. LCQ scores were documented in all groups at 0 h, 48 h, 2 months, and 8 months after the training.
Within groups, comparison was done by the paired t-test and between groups by ANCOVA.
The new LCQ was analyzed using split-half reliability and was found to be having a correlation coefficient 0.96. On within group analysis, the IAM group showed a significant decrease in LCQ scores (P = 0.004) in the second visit which was maintained in the third (P = 0.003) and fourth visits (P = 0.001). Within the PMR group, there was a significant decrease (P = 0.006) in the third visit and fourth visits (P = 0.001). No significant change was seen within the control group in any of the visits. The decrease in LCQ scores in the IAM group was significant at the end of 8 months when compared to the Control group (P < 0.05) whereas the decrease in the PMR group was not significant in comparison with the control group.
The IAM technique is an efficient tool in reducing stress as measured by LCQ.
已发现冥想等放松技巧有助于减轻压力。
旨在探究整合阿姆里塔冥想(IAM)技巧对生活变化应对能力的影响。
采用IAM技巧、渐进性肌肉松弛(PMR)技巧及生活变化问卷(LCQ)。LCQ在文化上进行了针对印度人群的调整。150名受试者被随机分为IAM组、PMR组和对照组。在训练后0小时、48小时、2个月和8个月记录所有组的LCQ分数。
组内比较采用配对t检验,组间比较采用协方差分析。
新的LCQ经分半信度分析,发现其相关系数为0.96。在组内分析中,IAM组在第二次访视时LCQ分数显著降低(P = 0.004),第三次(P = 0.003)和第四次访视(P = 0.001)时保持降低。在PMR组中,第三次访视和第四次访视时显著降低(P = 0.006和P = 0.001)。对照组在任何一次访视中均未观察到显著变化。与对照组相比,IAM组在8个月末LCQ分数的降低具有显著性(P < 0.05),而PMR组与对照组相比降低不显著。
如通过LCQ所测,IAM技巧是减轻压力的有效工具。