Department of Psychology, University of York York, UK.
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 19;2:263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00263. eCollection 2011.
Many studies have repeatedly shown an orthographic consistency effect in the auditory lexical decision task. Words with phonological rimes that could be spelled in multiple ways (i.e., inconsistent words) typically produce longer auditory lexical decision latencies and more errors than do words with rimes that could be spelled in only one way (i.e., consistent words). These results have been extended to different languages and tasks, suggesting that the effect is quite general and robust. Despite this growing body of evidence, some psycholinguists believe that orthographic effects on spoken language are exclusively strategic, post-lexical, or restricted to peculiar (low-frequency) words. In the present study, we manipulated consistency and word-frequency orthogonally in order to explore whether the orthographic consistency effect extends to high-frequency words. Two different tasks were used: lexical decision and rime detection. Both tasks produced reliable consistency effects for both low- and high-frequency words. Furthermore, in Experiment 1 (lexical decision), an interaction revealed a stronger consistency effect for low-frequency words than for high-frequency words, as initially predicted by Ziegler and Ferrand (1998), whereas no interaction was found in Experiment 2 (rime detection). Our results extend previous findings by showing that the orthographic consistency effect is obtained not only for low-frequency words but also for high-frequency words. Furthermore, these effects were also obtained in a rime detection task, which does not require the explicit processing of orthographic structure. Globally, our results suggest that literacy changes the way people process spoken words, even for frequent words.
许多研究在听觉词汇判断任务中反复表明存在正字法一致性效应。具有可以用多种方式拼写的音韵韵脚(即不一致的单词)的单词通常比具有只能用一种方式拼写的韵脚(即一致的单词)的单词产生更长的听觉词汇判断潜伏期和更多的错误。这些结果已扩展到不同的语言和任务,表明该效应相当普遍且稳健。尽管有越来越多的证据,但一些心理语言学家认为,正字法对口语的影响仅具有策略性、词汇后或仅限于特殊(低频)单词。在本研究中,我们正交地操纵了一致性和单词频率,以探究正字法一致性效应是否扩展到高频单词。使用了两种不同的任务:词汇判断和韵脚检测。这两个任务都为低频词和高频词产生了可靠的一致性效应。此外,在实验 1(词汇判断)中,交互作用显示低频词的一致性效应强于高频词,这与 Ziegler 和 Ferrand(1998)的最初预测一致,而在实验 2(韵脚检测)中则未发现交互作用。我们的结果通过表明正字法一致性效应不仅适用于低频词,也适用于高频词,扩展了先前的发现。此外,这些效应在不需要明确处理正字法结构的韵脚检测任务中也得到了证实。总体而言,我们的结果表明,识字改变了人们处理口语单词的方式,即使是高频单词也是如此。