Molecular Ecology Group, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming System, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026530. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations.
The two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species.
在生态上差异很大的物种之间,固定的遗传差异会随着所检查的标记而发生很大的变化。对于这些物种来说,很难区分共同的祖先多态性和物种分化过程中的过去基因渗入。为了理清这些可能性,并进一步为植物 DNA 条形码提供案例,我们使用三种不同类型的遗传标记,研究了两种生态上差异很大的杨属物种,胡杨和毛白杨之间的遗传分化。
方法/主要发现:我们对 29 个来自 29 个异地和同域种群的 290 个个体进行了基因型分析,使用叶绿体(cp)DNA、核(nr)ITS 序列和 8 个简单重复序列(SSR)位点。两种物种之间以及种间 cpDNA 分化(F(CT))非常低,甚至低于单一物种种群。三个主要的 cpDNA 单倍型在两个物种之间广泛共享。平均 SSR F(CT)值较高。所有位点的贝叶斯聚类分析可以清楚地区分这两个物种。通过检查所有 SSR 位点确定的基因流是明显的,但只是稍微不对称。然而,这两个物种几乎固定了两种不同的 nrITS 基因型,这些基因型的 F(CT)最高,尽管在异地和同域种群中都检测到了一些渗入个体。
这两个物种在 cpDNA 和少数 SSR 位点上共享了许多祖先多态性。ITS 和核 SSR 数据的组合都可以用于区分这两个物种。这两个物种之间存在明显的基因渗入和基因流,无论是在它们分化之前还是之后。我们的研究结果强调了生态上差异很大的物种之间复杂的遗传分化,并突出了核 DNA(特别是 ITS)分化对于界定密切相关的植物物种的重要性。