Hossain M Jaber, Bourgeois Melissa, Quan Fu-Shi, Lipatov Aleksandr S, Song Jae-Min, Chen Li-Mei, Compans Richard W, York Ian, Kang Sang-Moo, Donis Ruben O
Influenza Division, Mailstop G-16, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Dec;18(12):2010-7. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05206-11. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
Immunization of the world population before an influenza pandemic such as the 2009 H1N1 virus spreads globally is not possible with current vaccine production platforms. New influenza vaccine technologies, such as virus-like-particles (VLPs), offer a promising alternative. Here, we tested the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a VLP vaccine containing hemagglutinin (HA) and M1 from the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus (H1N1pdm) in ferrets and compared intramuscular (i.m.) and intranasal (i.n.) routes of immunization. Vaccination of ferrets with VLPs containing the M1 and HA proteins from A/California/04/2009 (H1N1pdm) induced high antibody titers and conferred significant protection against virus challenge. VLP-vaccinated animals lost less weight, shed less virus in nasal washes, and had markedly lower virus titers in all organs tested than naïve controls. A single dose of VLPs, either i.m. or i.n., induced higher levels of antibody than did two doses of commercial split vaccine. Ferrets vaccinated with split vaccine were incompletely protected against challenge; these animals had lower virus titers in olfactory bulbs, tonsils, and intestines, but lost weight and shed virus in nasal washes to a similar extent as naïve controls. Challenge with heterologous A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) virus revealed that the VLPs conferred minimal cross-protection to heterologous infection, as revealed by the lack of reduction in nasal wash and lung virus titers and slightly higher weight loss relative to controls. In summary, these experiments demonstrate the strong immunogenicity and protective efficacy of VLPs compared to the split vaccine and show that i.n. vaccination with VLPs has the potential for highly efficacious vaccination against influenza.
在流感大流行(如2009年甲型H1N1流感病毒在全球传播)之前对全球人口进行免疫接种,使用当前的疫苗生产平台是不可能实现的。新型流感疫苗技术,如病毒样颗粒(VLP),提供了一个有前景的替代方案。在此,我们在雪貂中测试了一种包含2009年大流行甲型H1N1流感病毒(H1N1pdm)血凝素(HA)和M1的VLP疫苗的免疫原性和保护效力,并比较了肌肉注射(i.m.)和鼻内(i.n.)免疫途径。用含有来自A/California/04/2009(H1N1pdm)的M1和HA蛋白的VLP对雪貂进行疫苗接种可诱导高抗体滴度,并对病毒攻击提供显著保护。接种VLP疫苗的动物体重减轻较少,鼻洗液中排出的病毒较少,并且在所有测试器官中的病毒滴度明显低于未接种疫苗的对照。单剂量的VLP,无论是肌肉注射还是鼻内接种,诱导的抗体水平都高于两剂商业裂解疫苗。接种裂解疫苗的雪貂对攻击的保护不完全;这些动物在嗅球、扁桃体和肠道中的病毒滴度较低,但体重减轻和鼻洗液中排出病毒的程度与未接种疫苗的对照相似。用异源A/Brisbane/59/07(H1N1)病毒进行攻击表明,VLP对异源感染的交叉保护作用最小,这表现为鼻洗液和肺病毒滴度没有降低,且相对于对照体重减轻略高。总之,这些实验证明了VLP与裂解疫苗相比具有很强的免疫原性和保护效力,并表明鼻内接种VLP有潜力实现高效的流感疫苗接种。