Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 28;8:120. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-120.
Adolescent females have been highlighted as a particularly sedentary population and the possible negative effects of a sedentary lifestyle are being uncovered. However, much of the past sedentary research is based on self-report or uses indirect methods to quantity sedentary time. Total time spent sedentary and the possible intricate sedentary patterns of adolescent females have not been described using objective and direct measure of body inclination. The objectives of this article are to examine the sedentary levels and patterns of a group of adolescent females using the ActivPAL™ and to highlight possible differences in sedentary levels and patterns across the week and within the school day. A full methodological description of how the data was analyzed is also presented.
One hundred and eleven adolescent females, age 15-18 yrs, were recruited from urban and rural areas in the Republic of Ireland. Participants wore an ActivPAL physical activity monitor for a 7.5 day period. The ActivPAL directly reports total time spent sitting/lying every 15 seconds and accumulation (frequency and duration) of sedentary activity was examined using a customized MATLAB(®) computer software programme.
While no significant difference was found in the total time spent sitting/lying over the full 24 hour day between weekday and weekend day (18.8 vs. 18.9 hours; p = .911), significantly more sedentary bouts of 1 to 5 minutes and 21 to 40 minutes in duration were accumulated on weekdays compared to weekend days (p < .001). The mean length of each sedentary bout was also longer (9.8 vs. 8.8 minutes; p < .001). When school hours (9 am-3 pm) and after school hours (4 pm-10 pm) were compared, there was no difference in total time spent sedentary (3.9 hours; p = .796) but the pattern of accumulation of the sedentary time differed. There were a greater number of bouts of > 20 minutes duration during school hours than after school hours (4.7 vs. 3.5 bouts; p < .001) while after school time consisted of shorter bouts < 20 minutes.
School is highlighted as a particularly sedentary setting for adolescent females. Interventions to decrease sedentary time at school and the use of wearable devices which distinguish posture should be encouraged when examining sedentary patterns and behaviors in this population.
青少年女性一直是久坐人群中的一个特殊群体,久坐生活方式可能产生的负面影响正在被揭示。然而,过去的许多久坐研究都是基于自我报告或使用间接方法来量化久坐时间。目前还没有使用身体倾斜的客观直接测量方法来描述青少年女性总的久坐时间和可能复杂的久坐模式。本文的目的是使用 ActivPAL™ 检查一组青少年女性的久坐水平和模式,并强调一周内和在校日期间久坐水平和模式的可能差异。本文还介绍了如何分析数据的完整方法描述。
从爱尔兰共和国的城市和农村地区招募了 111 名 15-18 岁的青少年女性。参与者佩戴 ActivPAL 活动监测器 7.5 天。ActivPAL 每 15 秒直接报告总共的坐/躺时间,使用定制的 MATLAB®计算机软件程序检查久坐活动的积累(频率和持续时间)。
尽管在整个 24 小时的白天,工作日和周末日之间在坐/躺总时间上没有显著差异(18.8 小时对 18.9 小时;p =.911),但在工作日,持续 1 到 5 分钟和 21 到 40 分钟的久坐时间明显增加(p <.001)。每个久坐时间的平均长度也更长(9.8 分钟对 8.8 分钟;p <.001)。当比较上学时间(上午 9 点至下午 3 点)和放学后时间(下午 4 点至晚上 10 点)时,在总的久坐时间上没有差异(3.9 小时;p =.796),但久坐时间的积累模式不同。在上学时间内,持续时间超过 20 分钟的时间较多,而在放学后时间内,持续时间较短(4.7 次对 3.5 次;p <.001)。
学校被突出显示为青少年女性特别久坐的场所。在研究该人群的久坐模式和行为时,应鼓励减少学校内的久坐时间,并使用能够区分姿势的可穿戴设备。