Verloigne Maïté, Ridgers Nicola D, Chinapaw Mai, Altenburg Teatske M, Bere Elling, Van Lippevelde Wendy, Cardon Greet, Brug Johannes, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse
Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Egmontstraat 5, 1000, Brussel, Belgium.
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0894-9.
This study examined the frequency of and differences in sedentary bouts of different durations and the total time spent in sedentary bouts on a weekday, a weekend day, during school hours, during after-school hours and in the evening period in a sample of 10- to 12-year-old Belgian children.
Accelerometer data were collected as part of the ENERGY-project in Belgium (n = 577, 10.9 ± 0.7 years, 53% girls) in 2011. Differences in total sedentary time, sedentary bouts of 2-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30 and ≥30 min and total time accumulated in those bouts were examined on a weekday, a weekend day, during school hours, during after-school hours and in the evening period, using multilevel analyses in MLwiN 2.22.
More than 60% of the participants' waking time was spent sedentary. Children typically engaged in short sedentary bouts of 2-5 and 5-10 min, which contributed almost 50% towards their total daily sedentary time. Although the differences were very small, children engaged in significantly fewer sedentary bouts of nearly all durations during after-school hours compared to during school hours and in the evening period. Children also engaged in significantly fewer sedentary bouts of 5-10, 10-20, and 20-30 min per hour on a weekend day than on a weekday.
Although primary school children spend more than 60% of their waking time sedentary, they generally engaged in short sedentary bouts. Children's sedentary bouts were slightly longer on weekdays, particularly during school hours and in the evening period, although the differences were very small. These results suggest that in this age group, interventions focusing on reducing total sedentary time rather than interrupting prolonged sedentary time are needed.
本研究调查了10至12岁比利时儿童样本在工作日、周末、上学时间、放学后以及晚上不同时长久坐时段的频率和差异,以及久坐总时长。
加速度计数据作为比利时ENERGY项目的一部分于2011年收集(n = 577,年龄10.9 ± 0.7岁,53%为女孩)。使用MLwiN 2.22中的多水平分析,研究工作日、周末、上学时间、放学后以及晚上在久坐总时长、2至5分钟、5至10分钟、10至20分钟、20至30分钟以及≥30分钟的久坐时段以及这些时段累计的总时长方面的差异。
超过60%的参与者清醒时间处于久坐状态。儿童通常进行时长为2至5分钟和5至10分钟的短时间久坐,这几乎占其每日久坐总时长的50%。尽管差异非常小,但与上学时间和晚上相比,儿童在放学后几乎所有时长的久坐时段显著减少。与工作日相比,儿童在周末每小时5至10分钟、10至20分钟以及20至30分钟的久坐时段也显著减少。
尽管小学生超过60%的清醒时间处于久坐状态,但他们通常进行短时间的久坐。儿童在工作日的久坐时段略长,尤其是在上学时间和晚上,尽管差异非常小。这些结果表明,在这个年龄组,需要采取干预措施来减少久坐总时长,而不是打断长时间的久坐。