Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):208-15. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1321-2.
Damage control (DC) strategy has significantly contributed to mortality reduction in massively bleeding and critically injured trauma victims. However, there is a lack of literature validating the effectiveness of this approach in the elderly population.
The trauma registry of a Level I trauma center was utilized to identify all severely injured patients [Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16] from January 1996 to December 2007 who underwent initial DC procedures. Patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥3 were excluded from the analysis. Demographics, clinical and physiological parameters, and in-hospital outcome measures were compared between elderly (≥55 years) and younger (<55 years) patient cohorts subjected to DC procedures.
Overall, 158 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 34 patients (21.5%) were aged ≥55 years (range 55-85 years) and 124 patients (78.5%) were <55 years old (range 16-54 years). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10.1% (n = 16) with a significantly higher mortality rate for elderly patients than for younger patients: 29.4% vs. 4.8%; adjusted P = 0.001; adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.09 (2.30-21.74). When stratified by DC subgroups, the case-fatality rate was significantly higher for the elderly patients who underwent extremity DC procedures [19.2% vs. 3.2%; adjusted P = 0.032; adjusted OR with 95% CI 5.95 (1.16-30.30)] and DC laparotomy [55.6% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.005; OR and 95% CI 16.25 (2.32-114.06)]. Both cohorts required massive transfusion during the initial 24 h of admission (18.9 ± 2.9 vs. 15.1 ± 1.6 units of packed red blood cells; P = 0.290). Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding hospital and surgical intensive care unit lengths of stay or major in-hospital complications.
The mortality rate for elderly trauma patients undergoing DC is excessive at 29%. Despite the significant burden of injury and the massive transfusion requirement, most of the elderly patients subjected to DC survived and experienced in-hospital morbidity measures comparable to those of the younger patients. Our results provide further support for damage control intervention in severely injured elderly patients.
损伤控制(DC)策略显著降低了大量出血和严重创伤患者的死亡率。然而,目前缺乏该方法在老年人群中有效性的相关文献。
利用一级创伤中心的创伤登记处,确定 1996 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月期间所有接受初始 DC 程序的严重受伤患者(损伤严重度评分[ISS]≥16)。排除头部简明损伤量表(AIS)≥3 的患者。比较接受 DC 程序的老年(≥55 岁)和年轻(<55 岁)患者队列的人口统计学、临床和生理参数以及院内结局。
总体而言,158 名患者符合纳入标准。其中,34 名患者(21.5%)年龄≥55 岁(55-85 岁),124 名患者(78.5%)年龄<55 岁(16-54 岁)。总的院内死亡率为 10.1%(n=16),老年患者的死亡率明显高于年轻患者:29.4%比 4.8%;调整后 P=0.001;调整后的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)为 7.09(2.30-21.74)。按 DC 亚组分层,行四肢 DC 手术的老年患者病死率显著升高[19.2%比 3.2%;调整后 P=0.032;调整后的 OR 和 95%CI 为 5.95(1.16-30.30)]和 DC 剖腹术[55.6%比 7.1%;P=0.005;OR 和 95%CI 为 16.25(2.32-114.06)]。两组在入院后 24 小时内均需要大量输血(18.9±2.9 比 15.1±1.6 单位浓缩红细胞;P=0.290)。然而,两组在住院和外科重症监护病房的住院时间或主要院内并发症方面无统计学差异。
行 DC 的老年创伤患者的死亡率过高,为 29%。尽管损伤严重且需要大量输血,但大多数接受 DC 的老年患者存活下来,其院内发病率与年轻患者相当。我们的结果进一步支持对严重受伤的老年患者进行损伤控制干预。