• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预慢性下腰痛随机对照试验的规模和质量随时间的变化趋势。

Trends over time in the size and quality of randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic low-back pain.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, Missenden Rd, PO Box M201, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2023-z. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-2023-z
PMID:22037844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3296855/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Previous reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for low-back pain (LBP) have failed to identify any positive trend in study quality with more recent years of publication. This study aimed to identify and describe trends over time in the study design characteristics and risk of bias in chronic LBP trials performed over the past 30 years.

METHODS

One fifty-seven randomised trials of interventions for chronic LBP were extracted from recently published systematic reviews. The reviews included RCTs on physical and rehabilitation interventions, injection therapy and denervation procedures, complementary and alternative therapies and pharmacological interventions for chronic LBP. Study level data were extracted and analysed for trends associated with year of publication.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean sample size in the RCTs was 141 (median 70; range 17-3093). There was a slight increase in the median number of risk of bias criteria fulfilled from trials published prior to 1995 to those published after 1996. The analysis showed that in more recent years RCTs of medical interventions were more likely to be successfully blinded than RCTs of non-medical interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuing uncertainty regarding the efficacy of many interventions for chronic LBP again stresses the need for large RCTs with low risk of bias. Further research is needed into specific risks of bias within the RCTs for chronic LBP and the effect they have on the plausibility of the results.

摘要

目的

先前对腰痛(LBP)随机对照试验(RCT)的综述未能发现随着研究发表时间的推移,研究质量有任何积极的趋势。本研究旨在确定并描述过去 30 年来慢性 LBP 试验在研究设计特征和偏倚风险方面随时间的变化趋势。

方法

从最近发表的系统综述中提取了 157 项慢性 LBP 干预措施的随机试验。综述包括物理和康复干预、注射治疗和去神经手术、补充和替代疗法以及慢性 LBP 的药物干预的 RCT。提取研究水平的数据并进行分析,以确定与发表年份相关的趋势。

结果

总体而言,RCT 的平均样本量为 141 例(中位数 70 例;范围 17-3093 例)。在发表于 1995 年之前的试验和发表于 1996 年之后的试验中,满足偏倚风险标准的中位数数量略有增加。分析表明,在最近几年,医学干预 RCT 比非医学干预 RCT 更有可能成功进行盲法。

结论

许多慢性 LBP 干预措施的疗效仍存在持续的不确定性,这再次强调了需要进行低偏倚风险的大型 RCT。需要进一步研究慢性 LBP RCT 中的具体偏倚风险及其对结果可信度的影响。

相似文献

1
Trends over time in the size and quality of randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic low-back pain.干预慢性下腰痛随机对照试验的规模和质量随时间的变化趋势。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2023-z. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
2
Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low-back pain.用于慢性下背痛的治疗性超声
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14(3):CD009169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009169.pub2.
3
Responder analyses in randomised controlled trials for chronic low back pain: an overview of currently used methods.慢性下腰痛随机对照试验中的反应者分析:当前使用方法概述
Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):772-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3155-0. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
4
Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy.预防和治疗孕期骨盆及背部疼痛的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1(8):CD001139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001139.pub3.
5
The efficacy of a multimodal physical activity intervention with supervised exercises, health coaching and an activity monitor on physical activity levels of patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain (Physical Activity for Back Pain (PAyBACK) trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项包含监督锻炼、健康指导及活动监测的多模式体育活动干预对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者身体活动水平的疗效(背痛身体活动(PAyBACK)试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 15;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2436-z.
6
Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.腰痛管理建议:随机对照试验的系统评价
Man Ther. 2007 Nov;12(4):310-27. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
7
Effect of Scraping Therapy on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.刮痧疗法治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Mar;44(3):255-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.003. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
8
Reporting of Rehabilitation Intervention for Low Back Pain in Randomized Controlled Trials: Is the Treatment Fully Replicable?随机对照试验中腰痛康复干预的报告:该治疗方法是否完全可重复?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(5):412-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001290.
9
Clinical critical qualitative evaluation of the selected randomized controlled trials in current acupuncture researches for low back pain.当前针灸治疗腰痛研究中所选随机对照试验的临床关键定性评估
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Dec;8(12):1133-46. doi: 10.3736/jcim20101205.
10
The effectiveness of acupuncture, acupressure and chiropractic interventions on treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.针刺、指压和整脊疗法对伊朗慢性非特异性下腰痛的治疗效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017 May;27:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research.非特异性下腰痛研究的文献计量分析
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Mar 9;2020:5396734. doi: 10.1155/2020/5396734. eCollection 2020.
2
Can patient-reported profiles avoid unnecessary referral to a spine surgeon? An observational study to further develop the Nijmegen Decision Tool for Chronic Low Back Pain.患者报告的特征能否避免不必要的向脊柱外科医生转诊?进一步开发尼梅亨慢性下腰痛决策工具的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203518. eCollection 2018.
3
Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey.前五名疼痛学期刊发表的试验摘要的报告质量:一项系统调查方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;6(11):e012319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012319.
4
Effect of a single session of ear acupuncture on pain intensity and postural control in individuals with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.单次耳针治疗对慢性腰痛患者疼痛强度和姿势控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):328-35. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0158. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists.用于慢性下腰痛的奈梅亨决策工具。为二级或三级脊柱护理专家开发的临床决策工具。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e104226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104226. eCollection 2014.
6
Cost-effectiveness of minimal interventional procedures for chronic mechanical low back pain: design of four randomised controlled trials with an economic evaluation.微创介入治疗慢性机械性下腰痛的成本效益:四项随机对照试验的设计及经济性评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 28;13:260. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-260.
7
The use of functional neuroimaging to evaluate psychological and other non-pharmacological treatments for clinical pain.使用功能神经影像学评估临床疼痛的心理和其他非药物治疗。
Neurosci Lett. 2012 Jun 29;520(2):156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain.系统评价药物干预慢性非特异性下腰痛的疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1541-4. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
2
A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain.慢性非特异性下腰痛的物理康复干预效果的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
3
An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care.非特异性下腰痛初级保健管理临床指南的更新概述。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2075-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
4
Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review.注射治疗和神经切断术治疗慢性下腰痛:系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1425-49. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1411-0. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
5
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
6
A systematic review on the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine for chronic non-specific low-back pain.关于补充和替代医学治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的有效性的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Aug;19(8):1213-28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1356-3. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
7
Empirical evidence of an association between internal validity and effect size in randomized controlled trials of low-back pain.低腰背痛随机对照试验中内部有效性与效应大小之间关联的实证证据。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1685-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ab6a78.
8
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.2009 年考科蓝背部评价组系统评价更新方法指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f.
9
The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛患病率的上升。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 9;169(3):251-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543.
10
Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off?过度治疗慢性背痛:是时候收手了吗?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):62-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080102.