Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 28;13:260. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-260.
Minimal interventional procedures are frequently applied in patients with mechanical low back pain which is defined as pain presumably resulting from single sources: facet, disc, sacroiliac joint or a combination of these. Usually, these minimal interventional procedures are an integral part of a multidisciplinary pain programme. A recent systematic review issued by the Dutch Health Insurance Council showed that the effectiveness of these procedures for the total group of patients with chronic low back pain is yet unclear and cost-effectiveness unknown. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a multidisciplinary pain programme with minimal interventional procedures is cost-effective compared to the multidisciplinary pain programme alone for patients with chronic mechanical low back pain who did not respond to conservative primary care and were referred to a pain clinic.
All patients with chronic low back pain who are referred to one of the 13 participating pain clinics will be asked to participate in an observational study. Patients with a suspected diagnosis of facet, disc or sacroiliac joint problems will receive a diagnostic block to confirm this diagnosis. If confirmed, they will be asked to participate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For each single source a separate RCT will be conducted. Patients with a combination of facet, disc or sacroiliac joint problems will be invited for participation in a RCT as well. An economic evaluation from a societal perspective will be performed alongside these four RCTs. Patients will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after start of the treatment. Costs will be collected using self-completed cost questionnaires.
No trials are yet available which have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of minimal interventional procedures in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain, which emphasizes the importance of this study.
National Trial Register: NTR3531.
对于机械性下腰痛患者,常采用微创介入治疗,机械性下腰痛被定义为可能由单一来源引起的疼痛:小关节、椎间盘、骶髂关节或这些部位的组合。通常,这些微创介入治疗是多学科疼痛方案的一个组成部分。荷兰健康保险委员会最近发布的一项系统评价显示,对于慢性下腰痛的总患者群体,这些治疗方法的效果尚不清楚,成本效益也未知。本研究的目的是评估对于接受多学科疼痛方案治疗但对保守性初级保健无反应并转诊至疼痛诊所的慢性机械性下腰痛患者,与单纯多学科疼痛方案相比,微创介入治疗是否具有成本效益。
所有转诊至 13 家参与疼痛诊所之一的慢性下腰痛患者都将被邀请参加一项观察性研究。怀疑小关节、椎间盘或骶髂关节有问题的患者将接受诊断性阻滞以确认该诊断。如果确诊,他们将被邀请参加随机对照试验(RCT)。对于每个单一来源,将单独进行 RCT。对于小关节、椎间盘或骶髂关节问题的组合患者,也将邀请他们参加 RCT。在这四项 RCT 中,将同时进行一项基于社会角度的经济评估。患者将在基线、3 周和 6 周、3、6、9 和 12 个月治疗开始后完成问卷。使用自我完成的成本问卷收集成本。
目前尚无试验评估微创介入治疗在慢性机械性下腰痛患者中的成本效益,这凸显了本研究的重要性。
荷兰临床试验注册中心:NTR3531。