• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

iWorkHealth:一种用于识别多族裔亚洲劳动人口职场心理社会风险因素的工具。

iWorkHealth: An instrument to identify workplace psychosocial risk factors for a multi-ethnic Asian working population.

机构信息

Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.

Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):e0220566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220566. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0220566
PMID:31390355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6685634/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to develop iWorkHealth, a valid and reliable self-administered instrument which identifies workplace psychosocial risk factors in Singapore.

METHODS

The survey was conducted among 2718 employees who were primarily salaried workers and working in five companies from the healthcare, banking and finance, and legal sectors in Singapore. Factor extraction and item reduction were conducted using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Mokken scale analysis (MSA). Construct validity, internal consistency and convergent validity of the final scale were confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha and Pearson correlation coefficients, respectively. Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes model was used to detect Differential Item Functioning (DIF).

RESULTS

EFA and MSA identified a five-factor solution (job demand, job control, employee and management engagement, supervisor support and colleague support) for the 27 items iWorkHealth instrument. CFA demonstrated that the five-factor model fitted the data with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.79 to 0.92). The convergent validity was shown through significant association with existing scales-high job demand was significantly associated with high burnout and depression, while high job control, employee and management engagement, supervisor support and coworker support were significantly associated with low burnout and depression. Ten items were detected with significant DIF, but impact was minimal on the associations between socio-demographics factors and iWorkHealth subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provided evidence that the iWorkHealth instrument which comprises 27 items in five domains of psychosocial risk at the workplace is a reliable and valid instrument that could be used to measure and compare the level of psychosocial risk factors across companies and industries in Singapore.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发 iWorkHealth,这是一种有效的、可靠的自评工具,可识别新加坡工作场所的心理社会风险因素。

方法

该调查在新加坡的五家公司(医疗保健、银行和金融、法律行业)中,对 2718 名主要为受薪员工进行了调查。使用探索性因子分析(EFA)和莫肯量表分析(MSA)进行因子提取和项目缩减。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)、克朗巴赫α和皮尔逊相关系数分别确认最终量表的结构效度、内部一致性和聚合效度。使用多指标多原因模型(Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes model)检测差异项目功能(Differential Item Functioning,DIF)。

结果

EFA 和 MSA 确定了 iWorkHealth 仪器 27 个项目的五因素解决方案(工作需求、工作控制、员工和管理层参与、主管支持和同事支持)。CFA 表明,五因素模型与数据高度一致(克朗巴赫α值范围为 0.79 至 0.92)。通过与现有量表的显著关联,证明了聚合效度,高工作需求与高倦怠和抑郁显著相关,而高工作控制、员工和管理层参与、主管支持和同事支持与低倦怠和抑郁显著相关。发现有 10 个项目存在显著的 DIF,但对社会人口统计学因素与 iWorkHealth 子量表之间的关联影响很小。

结论

研究结果表明,iWorkHealth 仪器由五个工作场所心理社会风险领域的 27 个项目组成,是一种可靠和有效的工具,可用于衡量和比较新加坡各公司和各行业的心理社会风险因素水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eee/6685634/98e5fa3ee3e0/pone.0220566.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eee/6685634/98e5fa3ee3e0/pone.0220566.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eee/6685634/98e5fa3ee3e0/pone.0220566.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
iWorkHealth: An instrument to identify workplace psychosocial risk factors for a multi-ethnic Asian working population.iWorkHealth:一种用于识别多族裔亚洲劳动人口职场心理社会风险因素的工具。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):e0220566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220566. eCollection 2019.
2
Validation of the Job Content Questionnaire among hospital nurses in Vietnam.越南医院护士工作内容问卷的验证。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12086. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12086. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
3
The positive mental health instrument: development and validation of a culturally relevant scale in a multi-ethnic Asian population.积极心理健康量表:在多族群亚洲人群中开发和验证具有文化相关性的量表。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Oct 31;9:92. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-92.
4
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
5
Construct validity of the Thai version of the job content questionnaire in a large population of heterogeneous occupations.泰语版工作内容问卷在大量不同职业人群中的结构效度。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Apr;92(4):564-72.
6
Validity and Reliability of Malay Version of the Job Content Questionnaire among Public Hospital Female Nurses in Malaysia.马来西亚公立医院女护士中马来语版工作内容问卷的效度和信度
Int J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Oct;6(4):232-42. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2015.632.
7
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
8
The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity.丹麦心理社会工作环境问卷(DPQ):编制、内容、信度和效度。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jul 1;45(4):356-369. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3793. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort.Karasek工作内容问卷法语版的心理测量学特性:GAZEL队列中决策自由度、心理需求、社会支持和身体需求量表的研究
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Mar;75(3):129-44. doi: 10.1007/s004200100270.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (SG-PAID-C) among high-risk polypharmacy patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in Singapore.新加坡2型糖尿病控制不佳的高风险多重用药患者中糖尿病问题领域量表中文版(SG-PAID-C)的心理测量特性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Mar;8(2):235-242. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12556. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health and well-being at the workplace.工作场所的心理健康与幸福。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;66(Suppl 2):S353-S364. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_608_23. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
An Integrated Approach to Workplace Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Instruments That Can Assist Organizations with Implementation.工作场所心理健康的综合方法:可协助组织实施的工具的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021192.
3
Business Leadership from a Gender Perspective and Its Impact on the Work Environment and Employee's Well-Being in Companies in the Basque Country.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of considering differential item functioning in investigating the impact of chronic conditions on health-related quality of life in a multi-ethnic Asian population.在多民族亚洲人群中,研究慢性病对健康相关生活质量的影响时考虑差异项目功能的重要性。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):823-834. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1418-z. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
Psychosocial stress at work and cardiovascular diseases: an overview of systematic reviews.工作中的社会心理压力与心血管疾病:系统评价综述
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Nov;88(8):997-1014. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1019-0. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
3
Effort-reward imbalance at work and cardiovascular diseases.
从性别视角看商业领导力及其对巴斯克地区公司工作环境和员工福祉的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010030.
工作中的努力-回报失衡与心血管疾病。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2010;23(3):279-85. doi: 10.2478/v10001-010-0013-8.
4
The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.PHQ-8作为一般人群当前抑郁状况的一种测量工具。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
5
Investigating differential item functioning by chronic diseases in the SF-36 health survey: a latent trait analysis using MIMIC models.在SF-36健康调查中研究慢性病的差异项目功能:使用MIMIC模型的潜在特质分析。
Med Care. 2007 Sep;45(9):851-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318074ce4c.
6
Psychosocial work environment and incidence of severe depressive symptoms: prospective findings from a 5-year follow-up of the Danish work environment cohort study.心理社会工作环境与严重抑郁症状的发生率:丹麦工作环境队列研究5年随访的前瞻性结果
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 May 15;163(10):877-87. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj119. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
7
The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷——一种用于评估和改善心理社会工作环境的工具。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Dec;31(6):438-49. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.948.
8
Item bias in indices measuring psychosocial work environment and health.衡量心理社会工作环境与健康的指标中的项目偏差。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Jun;26(3):263-72. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.541.
9
The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.工作内容问卷(JCQ):一种用于心理社会工作特征国际比较评估的工具。
J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322.