Makuch Almut, Reschke Konrad, Rupf Stefan
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Primary Prevention and Department of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Germany.
J Dent Child (Chic). 2011 Jan-Apr;78(1):9-12.
The purpose of the present study was to compare artificial tooth-brushing models (TBM) and individual modeling regarding their efficacy in teaching the correct brushing movements to younger preschool children.
A total of 141 30- to 50-month-old preschool children who had not been previously instructed on tooth-brushing were enrolled in the present trial. Four different model types/groups were compared: (1) giant TBM; (2) animal TBM puppet; (3) child him/herself in front of the mirror; (4) another person with the child in the mirror. Parameters of imitational learning were investigated by means of single-person monitoring on the basis of a standardized observational method. The subjects were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups, which were comparable regarding gender and age. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.
This study demonstrated that behavioral modeling types 3 and 4 were more suitable as a methodological basis than TBM. Correct tooth-brushing position and movement were correlated with the attractiveness of the model and its similarity to the child. It was shown that human models achieved greatest learning success.
It is important to find a "helper" and an attractive model person assisting in guiding the brush with a feedback in a mirror.
本研究旨在比较人工牙刷模型(TBM)和个体示范在向学龄前儿童教授正确刷牙动作方面的效果。
共有141名30至50个月大、此前未接受过刷牙指导的学龄前儿童参与了本试验。比较了四种不同的模型类型/组:(1)大型TBM;(2)动物TBM玩偶;(3)孩子自己在镜子前;(4)另一个人和孩子一起在镜子前。基于标准化观察方法,通过单人监测对模仿学习参数进行了研究。受试者被随机分配到4个实验组,这些组在性别和年龄方面具有可比性。使用卡方检验进行统计分析。
本研究表明,行为示范类型3和4比TBM更适合作为一种方法基础。正确的刷牙位置和动作与模型的吸引力及其与孩子的相似度相关。结果表明,人类模型取得了最大的学习成功。
找到一个“助手”和一个有吸引力的示范者,在镜子中给予反馈并协助引导刷牙很重要。