National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Int J Psychol. 2010 Aug 1;45(4):294-302. doi: 10.1080/00207591003682027.
The aim of this research was to jointly test effects of work stressors and coping strategies on job performance among employees in the Greater China region. A self-administered survey was conducted to collect data from three major cities in the region, namely Beijing, Hong Kong, and Taipei (N = 380). Four important work stressors were assessed: heavy workload, organizational constraints, lack of work autonomy, and interpersonal conflict. We used a four-factor model of Chinese coping strategies composed of hobbies/relaxation, active action, seeking social support, and passive adaptation. Job performance was indicated by both task performance (quantity of work, quality of work, job knowledge) and contextual performance (attendance, getting along with others). We found that: (1) work stressors were related to job performance. Specifically, workload had a positive relation with quantity of work, whereas organizational constraints had negative relations with quantity of work and attendance. In addition, interpersonal conflict had a negative relation with getting along with others. (2) Chinese positive coping strategies were positively related to job performance. Specifically, seeking social support had positive relations with quantity of work and getting along with others, whereas active action had positive relations with attendance and job knowledge. (3) Chinese passive adaptation coping behaviors were negatively related to job performance. Specifically, passive adaptation had negative relations with quantity of work, quality of work, and getting along with others. The present study thus found joint effects of work stressors and coping behaviors among Chinese employees in the Greater China region, encompassing three sub-societies of mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Differential effects of Chinese positive and passive coping strategies were also noted. Most importantly, all these effects were demonstrated on multiple indicators of job performance, a rarely studied but important strain variable from the organizational point of view.
本研究旨在联合检验工作压力源和应对策略对大中华地区员工工作绩效的影响。采用自填式问卷调查收集了来自该地区三个主要城市(北京、香港和台北)的 380 名员工的数据。评估了四个重要的工作压力源:工作量大、组织限制、缺乏工作自主性和人际冲突。我们使用了由兴趣/放松、积极行动、寻求社会支持和被动适应组成的中国应对策略的四因素模型。工作绩效由任务绩效(工作量、工作质量、工作知识)和情境绩效(出勤、与他人相处)来表示。研究结果发现:(1)工作压力源与工作绩效有关。具体而言,工作量与工作量呈正相关,而组织限制与工作量和出勤率呈负相关。此外,人际冲突与与他人相处呈负相关。(2)中国积极的应对策略与工作绩效呈正相关。具体而言,寻求社会支持与工作量和与他人相处呈正相关,而积极行动与出勤率和工作知识呈正相关。(3)中国被动适应的应对行为与工作绩效呈负相关。具体而言,被动适应与工作量、工作质量和与他人相处呈负相关。因此,本研究发现工作压力源和应对行为对大中华地区的中国员工具有联合影响,涵盖了中国大陆、香港和台湾三个次社会。中国积极和消极应对策略的差异效应也得到了证实。最重要的是,所有这些效应都在工作绩效的多个指标上得到了证明,这是组织角度很少研究但很重要的压力变量。