Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Int J Psychol. 2011 Oct;46(5):346-53. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.565342. Epub 2011 May 24.
In order to inquire into the nature of retrieval in prospective memory in a naturalistic context, we investigated the number and circumstances of rehearsals of different kinds of intentions to be pursued during a single time period. Thirty-six students were given four minutes to generate a list of tasks they were planning to perform over the course of 10 days. During this retention interval, they were provided with pocket-size diaries in which they recorded the details of each occasion they thought about the tasks previously listed. As to the nature of any triggers or cues that prompted rehearsal, the participants were asked to choose one of three alternatives: (1) association with an internal or an external cue that accidently appeared in the surroundings (accidental rehearsals), (2) deliberate thinking, e.g. while planning (self-initiated rehearsals), (3) recollection that spontaneously popped into one's mind for no apparent reason (no-trigger rehearsals). The results showed that thoughts about intended actions appeared more often after accidental cues than for no apparent reason. However, the relative contribution of self-initiated triggers to the rehearsal process was substantial: Most importantly, it was the self-initiated rehearsal that differentiated between executed and unexecuted actions. In addition, the most activated intention resulted in a higher frequency of no-trigger and self-initiated rehearsals than the remaining intentions. Finally, perceived intention importance was positively related to both the number of rehearsals and the likelihood of successful task completion. The results are discussed with regard to which factors may be crucial for the successful performance of participants' own self-generated intentions in a natural setting. The role of deliberate rehearsal in specifying the details of the intended action and its designated retrieval context is highlighted.
为了探究自然情境下前瞻性记忆检索的本质,我们调查了在单个时间段内追求不同类型意图的排练次数和情况。 36 名学生被给予四分钟的时间来生成他们计划在十天内执行的任务列表。在这段保留间隔内,他们被提供了袖珍日记,他们在其中记录了每次想到之前列出的任务的详细信息。至于任何引发或提示排练的线索的性质,要求参与者从三个选择之一中进行选择:(1)与偶然出现在周围环境中的内部或外部线索的关联(意外排练),(2)刻意思考,例如在计划时(自我发起的排练),(3)没有明显原因自发出现在脑海中的回忆(无触发排练)。结果表明,与无明显原因相比,意外线索后出现的意图行动的想法更为频繁。然而,自我发起的触发对排练过程的相对贡献是实质性的:最重要的是,正是自我发起的排练区分了执行和未执行的动作。此外,最活跃的意图比其余意图导致更高频率的无触发和自我发起的排练。最后,感知到的意图重要性与排练次数和成功完成任务的可能性呈正相关。结果讨论了哪些因素可能对参与者在自然环境中成功执行自己生成的意图至关重要。强调了刻意排练在指定意图行动的细节及其指定检索上下文方面的作用。