• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生支出的边缘效益分配:来自印度尼西亚国家以下数据的证据。

Marginal benefit incidence of public health spending: evidence from Indonesian sub-national data.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.09.003
PMID:22047653
Abstract

We examine the marginal effects of decentralized public health spending by incorporating estimates of behavioural responses to changes in health spending in benefit incidence analysis. The analysis is based on a panel dataset of 207 Indonesian districts over the period from 2001 to 2004. We show that district public health spending is largely driven by central government transfers, with an elasticity of around 0.9. We find a positive effect of public health spending on utilization of outpatient care in the public sector for the poorest two quartiles. We find no evidence that public expenditures crowd out utilization of private services or household health spending. Our analysis suggests that increased public health spending improves targeting to the poor, as behavioural changes in public health care utilization are pro-poor. Nonetheless, most of the benefits of the additional spending accrued to existing users of services, as initial utilization shares outweigh the behavioural responses.

摘要

我们通过在受益归属分析中纳入对卫生支出变化的行为反应的估计,考察了分散的公共卫生支出的边际效应。该分析基于 2001 年至 2004 年期间的 207 个印度尼西亚区的面板数据集。我们表明,区公共卫生支出主要由中央政府转移支付驱动,弹性约为 0.9。我们发现,公共卫生支出对最贫困的两个四分位数的公共部门门诊服务利用率有正向影响。我们没有发现公共支出挤出私人服务或家庭卫生支出利用的证据。我们的分析表明,增加公共卫生支出改善了对穷人的针对性,因为公共卫生保健利用方面的行为变化有利于穷人。尽管如此,由于初始利用份额超过了行为反应,大部分额外支出的收益都流向了现有服务使用者。

相似文献

1
Marginal benefit incidence of public health spending: evidence from Indonesian sub-national data.公共卫生支出的边缘效益分配:来自印度尼西亚国家以下数据的证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
Public spending on health care and the poor.公共医疗保健支出与贫困人口
Health Econ. 2003 Aug;12(8):685-96. doi: 10.1002/hec.759.
3
Benefit-incidence analysis of government spending on Ministry of Health outpatient services in Jordan.约旦卫生部门诊服务政府支出的受益-发病率分析。
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 May;16(5):467-73.
4
National health expenditures: a global analysis.国家卫生支出:全球分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(4):623-37.
5
The distribution of public spending for health care in the United States, 2002.美国 2002 年卫生保健公共支出分布情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):w349-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.w349. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
6
The costs of public primary health care services in rural Indonesia.印度尼西亚农村地区公共初级卫生保健服务的成本。
Bull World Health Organ. 1989;67(6):685-94.
7
Public spending on health care in Africa: do the poor benefit?非洲医疗保健方面的公共支出:穷人受益了吗?
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):66-74.
8
Benefit-incidence analysis: are government health expenditures more pro-rich than we think?受益-发病率分析:政府卫生支出比我们想象的更有利于富人吗?
Health Econ. 2012 Apr;21(4):351-66. doi: 10.1002/hec.1727. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
9
Publicly funded medical savings accounts: expenditure and distributional impacts in Ontario, Canada.公共资助的医疗储蓄账户:加拿大安大略省的支出及分配影响
Health Econ. 2008 Oct;17(10):1129-51. doi: 10.1002/hec.1310.
10
Public and private pharmaceutical spending as determinants of health outcomes in Canada.加拿大公共和私人药品支出对健康结果的影响因素。
Health Econ. 2005 Feb;14(2):107-16. doi: 10.1002/hec.922.

引用本文的文献

1
Do health facility governing committees improve health system performance? An ecological study of Mainland Tanzania.卫生设施管理委员会能否改善卫生系统绩效?坦桑尼亚大陆的一项生态研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jun 15;10(6):e015753. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015753.
2
Medical insurance benefits and health inequality: evidence from rural China.医疗保险福利与健康不平等:来自中国农村的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1363764. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1363764. eCollection 2024.
3
Decentralization of the health system - experiences from Pakistan, Portugal and Brazil.
卫生系统权力下放——来自巴基斯坦、葡萄牙和巴西的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 27;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01145-3.
4
Supply-side readiness to deliver HIV testing and treatment services in Indonesia: Going the last mile to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of HIV.印度尼西亚在提供艾滋病毒检测和治疗服务方面的供应方准备情况:为消除艾滋病毒母婴传播而竭尽全力。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;2(8):e0000845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000845. eCollection 2022.
5
Using measures of quality of care to assess equity in health care funding for primary care: analysis of Indonesian household data.利用医疗质量措施评估初级保健医疗资金公平性:印度尼西亚家庭数据分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08739-z.
6
Contracting Out National Immunization Program Does Not Improve Vaccination Rate Nor Socioeconomic Inequality: A Case Study of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in South Korea.签约外包国家免疫计划并不能提高疫苗接种率或缩小社会经济不平等:以韩国季节性流感疫苗接种为例。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;9:769176. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.769176. eCollection 2021.
7
Determinants of out-of-district health facility bypassing in East Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚东爪哇地区医疗服务点选择的决定因素。
Int Health. 2021 Dec 1;13(6):545-554. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa104.
8
Is a Decentralised Health Policy Associated With Better Self-rated Health and Health Services Evaluation? A Comparative Study of European Countries.去中心化的卫生政策是否与更好的自评健康和卫生服务评估相关?对欧洲国家的比较研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Feb 1;10(2):55-66. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.13.
9
Estimating Social Variation in the Health Effects of Changes in Health Care Expenditure.估算医疗支出变化对健康影响的社会差异。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):170-182. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904360. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
10
Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries: an overview.促进中低收入国家卫生资源配置公平性的方法:概述。
Global Health. 2020 Jan 13;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0537-z.