• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子处方数据比较三种口服抗糖尿病治疗药物的持久性和耐用性:依从性要求和囤药的影响。

Comparisons of persistence and durability among three oral antidiabetic therapies using electronic prescription-fill data: the impact of adherence requirements and stockpiling.

机构信息

VA Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):813-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.228. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1038/clpt.2011.228
PMID:22048232
Abstract

Two important challenges are inherent in the design of studies using prescription data from electronic health records: how to define the minimum level of adherence that would qualify as "continuous drug use" and how to handle stockpiling of medications. Generally, the sensitivity of a study's conclusions to these design choices is not analyzed. In our study, covariate adjusted Cox models were used to compare persistence and durability with respect to three common oral antidiabetic therapies in a cohort of 12,697 incident users. Assuming 50% stockpiling, sulfonylurea therapy, as compared with metformin, showed a significantly lower risk of nonpersistence (changing or stopping therapy) when no gap days were allowed (HR 0.95, P = 0.032), no significant difference when 14 gap days were allowed (HR 0.99, P = 0.536), and significantly greater risk of nonpersistence when 30 gap days were allowed (HR 1.05, P = 0.046). All the drug comparisons showed statistically significant effects in both directions, the risk of nonpersistence increasing or decreasing depending on the design parameters.

摘要

使用电子健康记录中的处方数据进行研究设计时存在两个重要挑战

如何定义符合“连续用药”标准的最低用药依从性水平,以及如何处理药物囤积问题。通常,研究结论对这些设计选择的敏感性并没有进行分析。在我们的研究中,针对 12697 例新诊断使用患者,使用协变量调整的 Cox 模型比较了三种常见口服抗糖尿病药物的持续用药和耐用性。假设存在 50%的药物囤积情况,与二甲双胍相比,在不允许有空白天数的情况下,磺酰脲类药物治疗的无持续用药(改变或停止治疗)风险显著降低(HR 0.95,P = 0.032);允许有 14 个空白天数时,无显著差异(HR 0.99,P = 0.536);允许有 30 个空白天数时,无持续用药风险显著增加(HR 1.05,P = 0.046)。所有药物比较在两个方向上均显示出统计学上的显著影响,无持续用药的风险取决于设计参数而增加或降低。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of persistence and durability among three oral antidiabetic therapies using electronic prescription-fill data: the impact of adherence requirements and stockpiling.利用电子处方数据比较三种口服抗糖尿病治疗药物的持久性和耐用性:依从性要求和囤药的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):813-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.228. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
2
Initial choice of oral glucose-lowering medication for diabetes mellitus: a patient-centered comparative effectiveness study.糖尿病患者口服降糖药物的初始选择:一项以患者为中心的比较有效性研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1955-62. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5294.
3
Long term patterns of use after initiation of oral antidiabetic drug therapy.起始口服降糖药物治疗后的长期使用模式。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):351-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.2089. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
4
Recent metformin adherence and the risk of hypoglycaemia in the year following intensification with a sulfonylurea.近期二甲双胍的使用依从性与磺酰脲类药物强化治疗后一年内低血糖风险的关系。
Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):482-490. doi: 10.1111/dme.13853. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
Comparative adherence to diabetes drugs: An analysis of electronic health records and claims data.比较糖尿病药物的依从性:电子健康记录和索赔数据分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Aug;19(8):1184-1187. doi: 10.1111/dom.12931. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
6
Persistence patterns with oral antidiabetes drug treatment in newly treated patients--a population-based study.新诊断糖尿病患者口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的持续模式——一项基于人群的研究。
Value Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(6):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00761.x.
7
Progression to insulin for patients with diabetes mellitus on dual oral antidiabetic therapy using the US Department of Defense Database.美国国防部数据库中使用双重口服抗糖尿病药物的糖尿病患者进展为胰岛素治疗。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Oct;15(10):901-5. doi: 10.1111/dom.12103. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
8
The Association between Depression and Medication Nonpersistence in New Users of Antidiabetic Drugs.糖尿病药物新使用者中抑郁症与药物治疗不依从性之间的关联。
Value Health. 2017 Jun;20(6):728-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2399. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
A retrospective cohort study of economic outcomes and adherence to monotherapy with metformin, pioglitazone, or a sulfonylurea among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States from 2003 to 2005.一项回顾性队列研究,评估了 2003 年至 2005 年美国 2 型糖尿病患者采用二甲双胍、吡格列酮或磺酰脲类药物单药治疗的经济学结局和依从性。
Clin Ther. 2010 Jul;32(7):1308-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.07.011.
10
Important differences in the durability of glycaemic response among second-line treatment options when added to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上加用二线治疗方案时血糖反应耐久性的重要差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2016;48(4):224-34. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2016.1157263. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence and persistence to pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure: a nationwide cohort study, 2014-2020.心力衰竭患者药物治疗的依从性和持久性:一项全国性队列研究,2014-2020 年。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):405-415. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14206. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Time to Treatment Intensification in Patients Receiving DPP4 Inhibitors Sulfonylureas as the First Add-On to Metformin Monotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受二肽基肽酶4抑制剂和磺脲类药物作为二甲双胍单药治疗首次联合用药的患者强化治疗时机:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 30;13:871052. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.871052. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient Factors Influencing Outpatient Retention in Patients with Affective and Anxiety Disorders: A Retrospective Study.
影响情感障碍和焦虑症患者门诊治疗留存率的患者因素:一项回顾性研究
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021 Aug 31;19(3):545-553. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2021.19.3.545.
4
Hospitalization for Heart Failure Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Reduced Kidney Function Treated With Metformin Versus Sulfonylureas: A Retrospective Cohort Study.二甲双胍与磺脲类药物治疗的糖尿病合并肾功能减退患者心力衰竭住院情况:一项回顾性队列研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(8):e019211. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019211.
5
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Opioid-Induced Constipation in an Older National Veteran Cohort.老年退伍军人队列中阿片类药物引起的便秘的流行率和危险因素。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Mar 29;2020:5165682. doi: 10.1155/2020/5165682. eCollection 2020.
6
Using Dispensing Data to Evaluate Adherence Implementation Rates in Community Pharmacy.利用配药数据评估社区药房的依从性实施率。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 26;10:130. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00130. eCollection 2019.
7
Patterns and trends of utilization of incretin-based medicines between 2008 and 2014 in three Italian geographic areas.2008年至2014年期间意大利三个地理区域内基于肠促胰岛素药物的使用模式与趋势。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0334-y.
8
Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.比较通过慢性心力衰竭患者的理赔数据来衡量药物依从性的不同策略。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):211-218. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1378. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Real-world adherence to oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.真实世界中房颤患者口服抗凝药物的依从性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e025102. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025102.
10
Estimating Adherence Based on Prescription or Dispensation Information: Impact on Thresholds and Outcomes. A Real-World Study With Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulants in Spain.基于处方或配药信息估算依从性:对阈值和结果的影响。西班牙口服抗凝剂治疗心房颤动患者的一项真实世界研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Dec 3;9:1353. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01353. eCollection 2018.