Roberto Giuseppe, Girardi Anna, Barone-Adesi Francesco, Pecere Alessandro, Ientile Valentina, Bartolini Claudia, Da Cas Roberto, Spila-Alegiani Stefania, Ferrajolo Carmen, Francesconi Paolo, Trifirò Gianluca, Poluzzi Elisabetta, Baccetti Fabio, Gini Rosa
Osservatorio di Epidemiologia, Agenzia Regionale di Sanità Della Toscana, Firenze, Italy.
Dipartimento di Medicina Traslazionale, Università Del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 30;13:871052. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.871052. eCollection 2022.
To verify whether, in patients on metformin (MET) monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (T2D), the add-on of a dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor (DPP4i) compared to a sulfonylurea (SU) can delay the time to the subsequent treatment intensification (TI). Population-based administrative data banks from four Italian geographic areas were used. Patients aged ≥18 years on MET monotherapy receiving first DPP4i or SU dispensing between 2008 and 2015 (cohort entry) were followed up to the occurrence of TI (insulin dispensing or add-on of a third non-insulin hypoglicemic >180 days after cohort entry), treatment discontinuation, switch, cancer, death, TI occurrence within, end of data availability, end of study period (31 December 2016), whichever came first. Patients on MET + DPP4i were matched 1:1 with those on MET + SU by sex, age, year of cohort entry, and data bank. Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated using multivariable Cox regression model including matching variables and potential confounders measured at baseline. Different sensitivity analyses were performed: i) matching at 180 days after cohort entry, ii) intent to treat (ITT) analysis, iii) matching by duration of MET monotherapy, iv) matching by propensity score. The matched study cohort included 10,600 patients. Overall, 763 TI were observed (4.5/100 person-years; mean follow-up = 1.6 years). The primary analysis showed no difference in time to TI between the two groups (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.88-1.19). Sensitivity analyses confirmed this result, except from the ITT analysis (HR = 1.27; 1.13-1.43). The use of a DPP4i rather than a SU as add-on to MET monotherapy was not associated with a delay in treatment intensification.
为验证在接受二甲双胍(MET)单药治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,与磺脲类药物(SU)相比,加用二肽基肽酶抑制剂(DPP4i)是否能延迟后续治疗强化(TI)的时间。使用了来自意大利四个地理区域的基于人群的行政数据库。对2008年至2015年期间(队列进入)开始接受首次DPP4i或SU配药的年龄≥18岁且接受MET单药治疗的患者进行随访,直至发生TI(胰岛素配药或在队列进入后180天以上加用第三种非胰岛素降糖药)、治疗中断、换药、癌症、死亡、在数据可用结束时发生TI、研究期结束(2016年12月31日),以先发生者为准。将接受MET + DPP4i治疗的患者与接受MET + SU治疗的患者按性别、年龄、队列进入年份和数据库进行1:1匹配。使用多变量Cox回归模型估计风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI),该模型包括匹配变量和在基线时测量的潜在混杂因素。进行了不同的敏感性分析:i)在队列进入后180天进行匹配,ii)意向性治疗(ITT)分析,iii)按MET单药治疗持续时间进行匹配,iv)按倾向评分进行匹配。匹配后的研究队列包括10,600名患者。总体而言,观察到763例TI(4.5/100人年;平均随访 = 1.6年)。初步分析显示两组之间TI时间无差异(HR = 1.02;95%CI = 0.88 - 1.19)。敏感性分析证实了这一结果,但ITT分析除外(HR = 1.27;1.13 - 1.43)。在MET单药治疗基础上加用DPP4i而非SU与治疗强化延迟无关。