• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对城市的熟悉程度与环境认知:一项自我报告研究。

Familiarity and environmental representations of a city: a self-report study.

作者信息

Piccardi L, Risetti M, Nori R

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Facoltà di Psicologia, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):309-26. doi: 10.2466/01.13.17.PR0.109.4.309-326.

DOI:10.2466/01.13.17.PR0.109.4.309-326
PMID:22049671
Abstract

"Sense of direction" is usually assessed by self-report. Several internal factors contribute to proficiency in navigation: spatial cognitive style, respondent's sex, and familiarity with the environment; however, questionnaires assessing sense of direction do not include all these factors. In a recent study, Nori and Piccardi reported that environmental familiarity was crucial for topographical orientation. Regardless of a person's spatial cognitive style (i.e., landmark, route, or survey), the greater their familiarity with the environment, the better their performance. In this study, a questionnaire was used, the Familiarity and Spatial Cognitive Style Scale, to measure 208 women's sense of direction and knowledge of their city of residence. Analysis showed that Spatial Cognitive Style predicted sense of direction but not town knowledge. By contrast, familiarity played a crucial role in both areas, confirming the importance of having a tool to assess this factor.

摘要

“方向感”通常通过自我报告来评估。有几个内部因素有助于提高导航能力:空间认知风格、受访者的性别以及对环境的熟悉程度;然而,评估方向感的问卷并未涵盖所有这些因素。在最近的一项研究中,诺里和皮卡迪报告称,环境熟悉程度对于地形定向至关重要。无论一个人的空间认知风格如何(即地标型、路线型或俯瞰型),他们对环境越熟悉,表现就越好。在这项研究中,使用了一份问卷,即“熟悉度和空间认知风格量表”,来测量208名女性的方向感以及她们对居住城市的了解程度。分析表明,空间认知风格可以预测方向感,但不能预测对城镇的了解程度。相比之下,熟悉度在这两个方面都起着关键作用,这证实了拥有一种评估该因素的工具的重要性。

相似文献

1
Familiarity and environmental representations of a city: a self-report study.对城市的熟悉程度与环境认知:一项自我报告研究。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):309-26. doi: 10.2466/01.13.17.PR0.109.4.309-326.
2
Predicting cognitive styles from spatial abilities.从空间能力预测认知风格。
Am J Psychol. 2006 Spring;119(1):67-86.
3
Spatial cognition and behavior in young and elderly adults: implications for learning new environments.年轻人和老年人的空间认知与行为:对学习新环境的启示
Psychol Aging. 1991 Mar;6(1):10-8. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.1.10.
4
The first-perspective alignment effect: the role of environmental complexity and familiarity with surroundings.第一视角对齐效应:环境复杂性和对周围环境熟悉程度的作用
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Nov;64(11):2236-50. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.586710. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
5
Gender differences in patterns of spatial ability, environmental cognition, and math and English achievement in late adolescence.青春期后期空间能力、环境认知以及数学和英语成绩模式中的性别差异。
Adolescence. 1989 Summer;24(94):421-31.
6
Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.认知地图准确性的个体差异:探究地标熟悉度的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):37-46. doi: 10.1037/cep0000165.
7
I believe I'm good at orienting myself… But is that true?我相信我很擅长确定自己的方位……但这是真的吗?
Cogn Process. 2015 Aug;16(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0655-3. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Familiarity expands space and contracts time.熟悉会拓展空间,压缩时间。
Hippocampus. 2017 Jan;27(1):12-16. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22672. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
Influence of attentional focus on skilled motor performance: performance decrement under unfamiliar focus conditions.注意焦点对熟练运动表现的影响:不熟悉的注意焦点条件下表现下降。
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Aug;32(4):730-40. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Age and gender differences in various topographical orientation strategies.不同拓扑定向策略中的年龄和性别差异。
Brain Res. 2011 Sep 2;1410:112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual Assessment of Developmental Topographical Disorientation: Comparing Self-Reported Measures with Actual Navigational Performance.发育性地形定向障碍的双重评估:自我报告测量与实际导航表现的比较
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):318. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030318.
2
Predicting spatial familiarity by exploiting head and eye movements during pedestrian navigation in the real world.通过利用现实世界中行人导航时的头部和眼睛运动来预测空间熟悉度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):7970. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92274-4.
3
Where Am I? Searching for the Tangle in the Developmental Topographical Disorientation.
我在哪里?探寻发育性地形定向障碍中的纠结之处。
Neurol Int. 2022 Oct 20;14(4):824-838. doi: 10.3390/neurolint14040067.
4
"Where am I?" A snapshot of the developmental topographical disorientation among young Italian adults.“我在哪?”年轻意大利成年人发展性拓扑定位障碍的快照。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0271334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271334. eCollection 2022.
5
GPS Digital Nudge to Limit Road Crashes in Non-Expert Drivers.利用全球定位系统数字助推来减少非专业驾驶员的道路交通事故
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 May 27;12(6):165. doi: 10.3390/bs12060165.
6
Sex Differences in Spatial Memory: Comparison of Three Tasks Using the Same Virtual Context.空间记忆中的性别差异:使用相同虚拟环境对三项任务的比较。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 7;11(6):757. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060757.
7
The Role of Gender and Familiarity in a Modified Version of the Almeria Boxes Room Spatial Task.性别与熟悉程度在阿尔梅里亚盒子房间空间任务修改版中的作用。
Brain Sci. 2021 May 22;11(6):681. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060681.
8
Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory.边走边聊不会干扰地形工作记忆。
Brain Sci. 2020 Nov 2;10(11):811. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110811.
9
Wayfinding Strategy and Gender - Testing the Mediating Effects of Wayfinding Experience, Personality and Emotions.寻路策略与性别——检验寻路体验、个性和情绪的中介作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Jan 31;13:119-131. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S236735. eCollection 2020.
10
Learning of Spatial Properties of a Large-Scale Virtual City With an Interactive Map.通过交互式地图学习大型虚拟城市的空间属性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;13:240. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00240. eCollection 2019.