van Mullem P J, Vaandrager J M, Nicolai J P, de Wijn J R
Department of Oral Histology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Biomaterials. 1990 Jul;11(5):299-304. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(90)90105-y.
Long-term (8 and 24 month) reactions of the (hypo) dermis of the guinea pig to solid and porous (50 vol%) acrylic implants and four human biopsies from porous subcutaneous acrylic implants were studied light microscopically. The solid implants were encapsulated by dense connective tissue. Mobility was evidenced by the loss of 4 out of 36 after 2 yr and was considered the explanation for the occurrence of ectopic cartilage and mineralized material at some solid implants' surfaces after 2 yr. A dense capsule was not evident with the porous implants, instead vascularized collagenous connective tissues penetrated into and filled the pores, thus anchoring the implant to the body. None of these implants, was lost. Notwithstanding the presence of some multinucleated giant cells, scattered inflammatory cells and loosely packed inflammatory foci with both implant materials, the materials were considered well-tolerated by the body. The histology of the human biopsy did not differ significantly from the porous animal implants.
对豚鼠(皮下)真皮对固体和多孔(50%体积)丙烯酸植入物的长期(8个月和24个月)反应以及来自多孔皮下丙烯酸植入物的四份人体活检样本进行了光学显微镜研究。固体植入物被致密结缔组织包裹。2年后36个中有4个发生移位,证明存在移动性,这被认为是2年后一些固体植入物表面出现异位软骨和矿化物质的原因。多孔植入物未形成明显的致密包膜,相反,血管化的胶原结缔组织长入并填充孔隙,从而将植入物固定于体内。这些植入物均未丢失。尽管两种植入材料周围均存在一些多核巨细胞、散在的炎性细胞和疏松的炎性灶,但机体对这些材料耐受性良好。人体活检样本的组织学与多孔动物植入物无显著差异。