Broxmeyer H E, Sherry B, Lu L, Cooper S, Oh K O, Tekamp-Olson P, Kwon B S, Cerami A
Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Blood. 1990 Sep 15;76(6):1110-6.
Purified recombinant (r) macrophage inflammatory proteins (MIPs) 1 alpha, 1 beta, and 2 were assessed for effects on murine (mu) and human (hu) marrow colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) colonies. Recombinant MIP-1 alpha, -1 beta, and -2 enhanced muCFU-GM colonies above that stimulated with 10 to 100 U natural mu macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) or rmuGM-CSF, with enhancement seen on huCFU-GM colony formation stimulated with suboptimal rhuM-CSF or rhuGM-CSF; effects were neutralized by respective MIP-specific antibodies. Macrophage inflammatory proteins had no effects on mu or huBFU-E colonies stimulated with erythropoietin (Epo). However, natural MIP-1 and rMIP-1 alpha, but not rMIP-1 beta or -2, suppressed muCFU-GM stimulated with pokeweed mitogen spleen-conditioned medium (PWMSCM), huCFU-GM stimulated with optimal rhuGM-CSF plus rhu interleukin-3 (IL-3), muBFU-E and multipotential progenitors (CFU-GEMM) stimulated with Epo plus PWMSCM, and huBFU-E and CFU-GEMM stimulated with Epo plus rhuIL-3 or rhuGM-CSF. The suppressive effects of natural MIP-1 and rMIP-1 alpha were also apparent on a population of BFU-E, CFU-GEMM, and CFU-GM present in cell-sorted fractions of human bone marrow (CD34 HLA-DR+) highly enriched for progenitors with cloning efficiencies of 42% to 75%. These results, along with our previous studies, suggest that MIP-1 alpha, -1 beta, and -2 may have direct myelopoietic enhancing activity for mature progenitors, while MIP-1 alpha may have direct suppressing activity for more immature progenitors.
评估了纯化的重组(r)巨噬细胞炎性蛋白(MIP)1α、1β和2对小鼠(mu)和人类(hu)骨髓集落形成单位-粒细胞-巨噬细胞(CFU-GM)以及爆式红系集落形成单位(BFU-E)集落的影响。重组MIP-1α、-1β和-2增强了muCFU-GM集落,其增强程度高于用10至100 U天然mu巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(M-CSF)或rmuGM-CSF刺激的情况,在用次优rhuM-CSF或rhuGM-CSF刺激的huCFU-GM集落形成中也观察到增强;相应的MIP特异性抗体可中和这些作用。巨噬细胞炎性蛋白对用促红细胞生成素(Epo)刺激的mu或huBFU-E集落没有影响。然而,天然MIP-1和rMIP-1α,但不是rMIP-1β或-2,抑制了用商陆丝裂原脾条件培养基(PWMSCM)刺激的muCFU-GM、用最佳rhuGM-CSF加rhu白细胞介素-3(IL-3)刺激的huCFU-GM、用Epo加PWMSCM刺激的muBFU-E和多能祖细胞(CFU-GEMM),以及用Epo加rhuIL-3或rhuGM-CSF刺激的huBFU-E和CFU-GEMM。天然MIP-1和rMIP-1α的抑制作用在人骨髓细胞分选部分(CD34 HLA-DR +)中高度富集的具有42%至75%克隆效率的祖细胞群体中的BFU-E、CFU-GEMM和CFU-GM上也很明显。这些结果,连同我们之前的研究,表明MIP-