Woods W G, Ruymann F B, Lampkin B C, Buckley J D, Bernstein I D, Srivastava A K, Smithson W A, Benjamin D R, Feig S A, Kim T H
University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis.
Cancer. 1990 Sep 15;66(6):1106-13. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1106::aid-cncr2820660605>3.0.co;2-y.
The Children's Cancer Study Group instituted a pilot study to investigate the use of high doses of cytosine arabinoside (AraC) in the intensification phase of treatment for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL). Patients achieving remission and not eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were treated with four doses of high-dose AraC and L-asparaginase. These drugs were repeated either on or after 28 days (q28 days), after recovery of hematologic parameters (for the first 49 patients entered onto this trial); or after 7 days (q7 days), despite dropping blood counts (for the last 53 patients enrolled). After completing an additional 3 months of intensification therapy, patients were then allocated by physician choice to either discontinue therapy or receive 18 28-day cycles of maintenance therapy, including the daily administration of 6-thioguanine. Despite three deaths associated with the toxicity of the aggressive (q7 days) AraC timing, patients receiving this approach demonstrated equal or better disease-free survival from the end of induction (55% versus 42% actuarially at 3 years [P = 0.52]). Maintenance therapy appeared to play no role in improving outcome for people who received the aggressive timing of AraC cycles. Fifty-nine percent were alive disease free actuarially at 3 years from the decision to not give maintenance therapy (n = 27) compared with 62% for those receiving maintenance therapy (n = 16; P = 0.49). On the other hand, patients who received the less aggressive AraC intensification timing (q28 days) had an improved survival rate if maintenance therapy was administered (n = 17) (65% versus 39% for patients not receiving maintenance therapy [n = 24] at 3 years [P = 0.07]). Maintenance therapy therefore may not improve outcome in patients receiving aggressive timing of high-dose AraC but may be important in less intensive postremission regimens in childhood ANLL.
儿童癌症研究组开展了一项试点研究,以调查在急性非淋巴细胞白血病(ANLL)治疗强化阶段使用高剂量阿糖胞苷(AraC)的情况。达到缓解且不符合异基因骨髓移植条件的患者接受了四剂高剂量阿糖胞苷和L-天冬酰胺酶治疗。这些药物在血液学参数恢复后(针对入组该试验的前49例患者),于28天或28天后(每28天)重复使用;或在血液计数下降的情况下,于7天后(每7天)重复使用(针对最后入组的53例患者)。在完成额外3个月的强化治疗后,医生根据选择将患者分为停止治疗或接受18个28天周期的维持治疗,包括每日服用6-硫鸟嘌呤。尽管有3例死亡与激进的(每7天)阿糖胞苷给药时间的毒性相关,但接受这种治疗方法的患者从诱导结束时起的无病生存率相同或更好(3年时实际生存率分别为55%和42%[P = 0.52])。维持治疗似乎对接受激进阿糖胞苷周期给药时间的患者的预后改善没有作用。从决定不进行维持治疗起3年时,59%的患者实际无病存活(n = 27),而接受维持治疗的患者为62%(n = 16;P = 0.49)。另一方面,接受不太激进的阿糖胞苷强化给药时间(每28天)的患者,如果进行维持治疗(n = 17),生存率会提高(3年时接受维持治疗的患者为65%,未接受维持治疗的患者为39%[n = 24][P = 0.07])。因此,维持治疗可能无法改善接受高剂量阿糖胞苷激进给药时间的患者的预后,但在儿童ANLL缓解后不太强化的治疗方案中可能很重要。