• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社区预防药物滥用办公室(CSAP)的战略预防框架来评估州药物滥用预防基础设施。

Assessing state substance abuse prevention infrastructure through the lens of CSAP's Strategic Prevention Framework.

作者信息

Piper Douglas, Stein-Seroussi Al, Flewelling Robert, Orwin Robert G, Buchanan Rebecca

机构信息

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Chapel Hill Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2012 Feb;35(1):66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.003
PMID:22054526
Abstract

Although the organizational structures and operating procedures of state substance abuse prevention systems vary substantially across states, there is scant empirical research regarding approaches for rigorous assessment of system attributes and which attributes are most conducive to overall effectiveness. As one component of the national cross-site evaluation of the SPF State Incentive Grant Program (SPF SIG), an instrument was developed to assess state substance abuse prevention system infrastructure in order to measure infrastructure change and examine the role of state infrastructure in achieving prevention-related outcomes. In this paper we describe the development of this instrument and summarize findings from its baseline administration. As expected, states and territories were found to vary substantially with respect seven key characteristics, or domains, of state prevention infrastructure. Across the six domains that were assessed using numeric ratings, states scored highest on data systems and lowest on strategic planning. Positive intercorrelations were observed among these domains, indicating that states with high capacity on one domain generally have relatively high capacity on other domains as well. The findings also suggest that state prevention infrastructure development is linked to both funding from state government and the presence of a state interagency coordinating body with decision-making authority. The methodology and baseline findings presented will be used to inform the ongoing national cross-site evaluation of the SPF SIG and may provide useful information to guide further research on state substance abuse prevention infrastructure.

摘要

尽管各州药物滥用预防系统的组织结构和运作程序差异很大,但关于对系统属性进行严格评估的方法以及哪些属性最有利于整体有效性的实证研究却很少。作为药物滥用预防基金(SPF)州激励拨款计划(SPF SIG)全国跨站点评估的一个组成部分,开发了一种工具来评估州药物滥用预防系统的基础设施,以衡量基础设施的变化,并研究州基础设施在实现预防相关成果中的作用。在本文中,我们描述了该工具的开发过程,并总结了其基线管理的结果。正如预期的那样,发现各州和领地在州预防基础设施的七个关键特征或领域方面存在很大差异。在使用数字评级评估的六个领域中,各州在数据系统方面得分最高,在战略规划方面得分最低。这些领域之间存在正相关关系,表明在一个领域能力强的州在其他领域通常也有相对较高的能力。研究结果还表明,州预防基础设施的发展与州政府的资金以及拥有决策权力的州跨部门协调机构的存在都有关联。所介绍的方法和基线研究结果将用于为正在进行的SPF SIG全国跨站点评估提供信息,并可能为指导关于州药物滥用预防基础设施的进一步研究提供有用信息。

相似文献

1
Assessing state substance abuse prevention infrastructure through the lens of CSAP's Strategic Prevention Framework.通过社区预防药物滥用办公室(CSAP)的战略预防框架来评估州药物滥用预防基础设施。
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Feb;35(1):66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
2
Substance abuse prevention infrastructure: a survey-based study of the organizational structure and function of the D.A.R.E. program.药物滥用预防基础设施:一项基于调查的关于毒品滥用抵抗教育(D.A.R.E.)项目组织结构与功能的研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Sep 6;1:25. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-25.
3
Effects of the Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentives Grant (SPF SIG) on state prevention infrastructure in 26 states.战略预防框架州激励拨款(SPF SIG)对26个州的州预防基础设施的影响。
J Prim Prev. 2014 Jun;35(3):163-80. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0342-7.
4
Sustainability of State-Level Substance Abuse Prevention Infrastructure After the Completion of the SPF SIG.物质滥用预防框架特别兴趣小组(SPF SIG)结束后州级物质滥用预防基础设施的可持续性
J Prim Prev. 2015 Jun;36(3):177-86. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0382-7.
5
Grant award to the Division of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, Department of Health and Social Services, State of Alaska. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), HHS. Availability of grant funds for the Division of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, Department of Health and Social Services, State of Alaska.向阿拉斯加州卫生与社会服务部心理健康与发育障碍司拨款。美国卫生与公众服务部下属的药物滥用和精神健康服务管理局的药物滥用治疗中心(CSAT)和精神健康服务中心(CMHS)。为阿拉斯加州卫生与社会服务部心理健康与发育障碍司提供拨款资金。
Fed Regist. 1999 Apr 16;64(73):18922-3.
6
The interactive systems framework applied to the strategic prevention framework: the Rhode Island experience.交互式系统框架应用于战略预防框架:罗得岛经验。
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):402-14. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9527-5.
7
The prevention delivery system: organizational context and use of comprehensive programming frameworks.预防服务提供系统:组织背景与综合规划框架的应用
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):361-78. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9164-1.
8
Impact of federal Substance Abuse Block Grants on state substance abuse spending: literature and data review.联邦药物滥用整笔拨款对州药物滥用支出的影响:文献与数据综述
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Dec;6(4):173-9.
9
Strengthening the public health system.加强公共卫生系统。
Public Health Rep. 1992 Nov-Dec;107(6):609-15.
10
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative study of states' capacity to support alcohol prevention policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间各州支持酒精预防政策能力的定性研究。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Sep;42(6):1358-1374. doi: 10.1111/dar.13714. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
2
Engaging Youth in Substance Misuse Prevention within State Prevention Systems: Provider Perspectives.让青少年参与州预防系统内的药物滥用预防:提供者观点
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2022 Jul;9(4):933-948. doi: 10.14485/hbpr.9.4.2. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Changing course: supporting a shift to environmental strategies in a state prevention system.
改变方向:在州预防系统中支持向环境战略转变。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00341-y.
4
A Qualitative Community Assessment of Racial/Ethnic Sexual Gender Minority Young Adults: Principles for Strategies to Motivate Action(s) for Realistic Tasks (SMART Thinking) Addressing HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse.种族/民族性少数群体青年成年人的定性社区评估:激励行动(聪明思维)以应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病、病毒性肝炎、心理健康和物质滥用的现实任务的原则。
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):1557988320966230. doi: 10.1177/1557988320966230.
5
A Social Network Analysis of a Coalition Initiative to Prevent Underage Drinking in Los Angeles County.洛杉矶县预防未成年人饮酒联盟倡议的社交网络分析
Proc Annu Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. 2015 Jan;2015:4356-4365. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2015.522. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
A Tool for Assessing a Community's Capacity for Substance Abuse Care.一种评估社区药物滥用护理能力的工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Sep 22;13:E133. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160190.
7
Reducing Binge Drinking in Adolescents through Implementation of the Strategic Prevention Framework.通过实施战略预防框架减少青少年酗酒行为
Am J Community Psychol. 2016 Mar;57(1-2):36-46. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12029.
8
Sustainability of State-Level Substance Abuse Prevention Infrastructure After the Completion of the SPF SIG.物质滥用预防框架特别兴趣小组(SPF SIG)结束后州级物质滥用预防基础设施的可持续性
J Prim Prev. 2015 Jun;36(3):177-86. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0382-7.
9
Effects of the Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentives Grant (SPF SIG) on state prevention infrastructure in 26 states.战略预防框架州激励拨款(SPF SIG)对26个州的州预防基础设施的影响。
J Prim Prev. 2014 Jun;35(3):163-80. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0342-7.