Lee Kyo Won, Park Yang Jin, Rho Young-Nam, Kim Dong-Ik, Kim Young-Wook
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 May;80(5):348-54. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.80.5.348. Epub 2011 May 6.
To evaluate the efficacy of B-mode ultrasonography (US) in measurement of carotid stenosis% (CS%).
One hundred and thirth-three carotid arteries in 96 patients who underwent both carotid US and carotid arteriography (CA) were included in this retrospective study. To measure CS% on US, a cross sectional view of the most stenotic segment of the internal carotid artery was captured and residual diameter and original diameter of that segment were measured with electronic caliper on the same plane and in the same direction. To measure CS% on an angiogram, we used European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) methods. Pearson's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were used to determine the correlation between CS% on an US and angiogram.
Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) between CS% measured in US and CA were 0.853 (ECST method, P < 0.001) and 0.828 (NASCET method, P < 0.001). Accuracies of B-mode US were 93.2%, 88.0%, and 81.2% for estimating CS% by ECST method and 86.5%, 82.7%, and 82% for estimating CS% by NASCET method.
CS% measured in B-mode US was simpler and showed a strong positive correlation with that measured on an arteriogram either ECST or NASCET method.
评估B型超声(US)测量颈动脉狭窄百分比(CS%)的有效性。
本回顾性研究纳入了96例同时接受颈动脉超声检查(US)和颈动脉血管造影(CA)的患者的133条颈动脉。为了在超声上测量CS%,获取颈内动脉最狭窄段的横断面图像,并在同一平面、同一方向上用电子卡尺测量该段的残余直径和原始直径。为了在血管造影片上测量CS%,我们采用了欧洲颈动脉外科试验(ECST)和北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)方法。采用Pearson相关分析和线性回归分析来确定超声测量的CS%与血管造影测量的CS%之间的相关性。
超声测量的CS%与血管造影测量的CS%之间的Pearson相关系数(R),采用ECST方法时为0.853(P<0.001),采用NASCET方法时为0.828(P<0.001)。B型超声采用ECST方法估计CS%的准确率分别为93.2%、88.0%和81.2%,采用NASCET方法估计CS%的准确率分别为86.5%、82.7%和82%。
B型超声测量的CS%方法更简单,且与采用ECST或NASCET方法在血管造影上测量的结果呈强正相关。