• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含左炔诺孕酮避孕阴道环治疗月经过多的随机对照研究

Contraceptive vaginal ring treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial with norethisterone.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.012
PMID:22067765
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the efficacy of the contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR; NuvaRing; N.V. Organon, Oss, the Netherlands) and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during the fertile age.

STUDY DESIGN

Ninety-five women with idiopathic HMB were selected in this randomized controlled trial. They were treated with either the CVR (n=48) or norethisterone (n=47) for three cycles. Each cycle consisted of 3 weeks of CVR use and then a 1-week ring-free period or norethisterone tablets, 5 mg three times daily from Cycle Days 5 to 26. Outcome measures were as follows: menstrual blood loss assessed by pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), duration of menses, hemoglobin, serum ferritin, quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, side effects and overall satisfaction with treatment.

RESULT

Significant improvements in PBAC score, the duration of menses, hemoglobin, serum ferritin and QoL were observed at the end of the study in each group. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the mean PBAC score (90.2±24.4 vs. 92.3±26.7) and its percent reduction (68.6% vs. 69.5%), duration of menses (5.3±1.2 vs. 5.5±1.1 days), hemoglobin and serum ferritin at the end of the study between the CVR and the norethisterone groups, respectively. Significantly more ring users were satisfied and elected to continue with treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both the CVR and oral norethisterone are effective treatments for idiopathic HMB. The CVR may be an attractive option especially for those requesting contraception as well.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了避孕阴道环(CVR;NuvaRing;荷兰 Organon 公司)和炔诺酮治疗生育期特发性月经过多(HMB)的疗效。

研究设计

本随机对照试验纳入了 95 例特发性 HMB 患者。他们分别接受 CVR(n=48)或炔诺酮(n=47)治疗,共 3 个周期。每个周期包括 3 周的 CVR 使用和 1 周的无环期,或炔诺酮片,5mg,每日 3 次,从周期第 5 天至第 26 天。疗效评估指标如下:采用图像出血量评估图表(PBAC)评估月经失血量、经期持续时间、血红蛋白、血清铁蛋白、生活质量(QoL)问卷、副作用和对治疗的总体满意度。

结果

研究结束时,两组的 PBAC 评分、经期持续时间、血红蛋白、血清铁蛋白和 QoL 均有显著改善。两组间 PBAC 评分的平均值(90.2±24.4 与 92.3±26.7)及其降低百分比(68.6%与 69.5%)、经期持续时间(5.3±1.2 与 5.5±1.1 天)、血红蛋白和血清铁蛋白均无统计学差异。CVR 组患者的满意度明显更高,且更愿意继续接受治疗。

结论

CVR 和口服炔诺酮均为治疗特发性 HMB 的有效方法。CVR 可能是一种特别有吸引力的选择,尤其是对那些同时需要避孕的患者。

相似文献

1
Contraceptive vaginal ring treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial with norethisterone.含左炔诺孕酮避孕阴道环治疗月经过多的随机对照研究
Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
2
Efficacy of combined hormonal vaginal ring in comparison to combined hormonal pills in heavy menstrual bleeding.与复方激素避孕药相比,复方激素阴道环治疗月经过多的疗效。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与炔诺酮治疗特发性月经过多的随机对照试验
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jun;105(6):592-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10172.x.
4
[A multicenter prospective randomized open comparative study on the treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia with tranexamic acid and norethisterone in China].[中国氨甲环酸与炔诺酮治疗排卵型月经过多的多中心前瞻性随机开放对照研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;43(4):247-50.
5
Comparison of combined hormonal vaginal ring with ultralow-dose combined oral contraceptive pills in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding: A pilot study.复方激素阴道环与超低剂量复方口服避孕药治疗月经过多的比较:一项试点研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(1):71-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1024210. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
6
[Ovarian activity, cycle behavior and tolerance of low dosage oral contraceptives: a comparative study].[卵巢活动、周期行为与低剂量口服避孕药耐受性:一项对比研究]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997;119(11):538-44.
7
A randomised trial comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding.一项比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统和热球囊消融术治疗月经过多的随机试验。
BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):257-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00863.x.
8
Comparison of the impact of vaginal and oral administration of combined hormonal contraceptives on hepatic proteins sensitive to estrogen.阴道给药与口服联合激素避孕药对雌激素敏感肝蛋白影响的比较。
Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6):430-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.027. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
9
The combined contraceptive vaginal device (NuvaRing): a comprehensive review.复方避孕阴道环(依伴依):全面综述
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005 Jun;10(2):73-8. doi: 10.1080/13625180500131683.
10
Bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of an oral compared with a vaginal hormonal contraceptive.与阴道激素避孕药相比,口服激素避孕药立即开始使用后的出血模式。
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;106(1):89-96. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164483.13326.59.

引用本文的文献

1
Family planning and nutrition: systematic review of the effects of family planning on nutritional status of adolescent girls and women of reproductive age.计划生育与营养:关于计划生育对青春期女孩和育龄妇女营养状况影响的系统评价
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Apr 24;10(Suppl 1):e015734. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015734.
2
Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research to advance the health of people with inherited bleeding disorders with the potential to menstruate.为社区主导的全国遗传性出血性疾病研究蓝图奠定基础:旨在推进可能存在月经的遗传性出血性疾病患者健康的研究。
Expert Rev Hematol. 2023 Mar;16(sup1):71-86. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2175660.
3
Variation of outcome reporting in studies of interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review.
月经过多干预研究中结果报告的差异:一项系统评价
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Sep;14(3):205-218. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.3.030.
4
Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.干预重度月经过多;Cochrane 综述和网络荟萃分析概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 31;5(5):CD013180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013180.pub2.
5
Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review.避孕价值观和偏好:全球系统评价。
Contraception. 2022 Jul;111:3-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world.阴道环可接受性:来自世界各地的阴道环使用体验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Contraception. 2022 Feb;106:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
7
Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review.在研究和临床实践中评估月经过多的图像方法:一项系统文献综述
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0887-y.
8
Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.中低收入国家女性对阴道环的可接受性和相关偏好:系统评价和叙述性综合。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0224898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224898. eCollection 2019.
9
Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的周期性孕激素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 14;8(8):CD001016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001016.pub3.
10
Combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding.复方激素避孕药用于治疗月经过多
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 11;2(2):CD000154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000154.pub3.