Gilbert H W, Everett W G
Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.
Br J Clin Pract. 1990 Aug;44(8):306-8.
This study compares the pain experienced by fifty patients following bilateral herniorrhaphy using two different methods of wound closure. No significant difference was found between the use of Michel clips and interrupted monofilament nylon sutures. Clips were preferred by a significant majority of patients, probably because they cause less pain on removal. The use of Michel clips should not be limited by the belief that they cause more pain than conventional sutures.
本研究比较了50例双侧疝修补术后采用两种不同伤口缝合方法的患者所经历的疼痛。使用米歇耳夹和间断单丝尼龙缝线之间未发现显著差异。绝大多数患者更喜欢夹子,可能是因为取下夹子时引起的疼痛较小。不应因认为米歇耳夹比传统缝线引起更多疼痛的观念而限制其使用。