• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于腹部伤口闭合的Michel夹和Proximate夹的临床比较。

Clinical comparison of Michel and Proximate clips used for abdominal wound closure.

作者信息

Gallagher P, Freeman J B

出版信息

Can J Surg. 1984 Nov;27(6):594-7.

PMID:6498655
Abstract

For many years Michel clips (Down Surgical, Mississauga, Ont.) have been used to close wounds and results have been good, but several newer clips are now available (e.g., Proximate; Ethicon Sutures Ltd.), which are said to be easier to use and produce a better scar. However, they are much more expensive. The authors carried out a prospective controlled study in which 30 patients with abdominal incisions had half of the skin incision closed with Michel clips and the other half with Proximate clips. They assessed ease of insertion and removal, and appearance of the wound immediately after removal and 2 months later. Ethicon Proximate clips were, in general, slightly easier to insert, less uncomfortable to remove in 8 of the 30 patients and gave a better immediate cosmetic result in 9 patients. However, there was no difference in the appearance of the wound 2 months later. The authors do not consider that Ethicon Proximate clips offer an advantage over the much less expensive Michel clips.

摘要

多年来,米歇尔夹(唐恩外科器械公司,安大略省密西沙加市)一直用于伤口闭合,效果良好,但现在有几种更新的夹子可供使用(例如,近端夹;爱惜康缝线有限公司),据说这些夹子使用起来更方便,能产生更好的瘢痕。然而,它们的价格要贵得多。作者进行了一项前瞻性对照研究,30例腹部切口患者的皮肤切口一半用米歇尔夹闭合,另一半用近端夹闭合。他们评估了夹子插入和移除的难易程度,以及移除后即刻和2个月后的伤口外观。总体而言,爱惜康近端夹插入时稍容易一些,30例患者中有8例移除时不适感较轻,9例患者移除后即刻的美容效果更好。然而,2个月后伤口外观并无差异。作者认为,爱惜康近端夹并不比便宜得多的米歇尔夹更具优势。

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of Michel and Proximate clips used for abdominal wound closure.用于腹部伤口闭合的Michel夹和Proximate夹的临床比较。
Can J Surg. 1984 Nov;27(6):594-7.
2
A comparative study between Michel and Proximate clips for the closure of neck incisions.用于颈部切口闭合的Michel夹与近端夹的比较研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Jul;73(4):204-6.
3
Randomised trial of subcuticular suture versus metal clips for wound closure after thyroid and parathyroid surgery.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后皮下缝合与金属夹闭伤口的随机试验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Jul;79(4):303-6.
4
Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure.比较近端吻合器与 Dermalon 皮肤缝合器的长期美容效果。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(1):30-1.
5
[Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods].[吻合器缝合还是单纽扣缝合?两种皮肤缝合方法比较的对照临床研究]
Chirurg. 1985 Mar;56(3):151-5.
6
Clips or sutures for herniorrhaphy wounds?疝修补术伤口用夹子还是缝线?
Br J Clin Pract. 1990 Aug;44(8):306-8.
7
Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.猪模型中伤口闭合技术的美学比较
Laryngoscope. 2001 Nov;111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200111000-00014.
8
Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?钛夹与缝合技术:有区别吗?
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Nov;16(11):1403-7.
9
Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.腹部伤口缝合:吻合器与缝线的比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1985 Aug;55(4):405-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1985.tb00910.x.
10
[Cutaneous mechanical staplers. Our experience].[皮肤机械吻合器。我们的经验]
Minerva Chir. 1997 Jul-Aug;52(7-8):1009-13.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study between Michel and Proximate clips for the closure of neck incisions.用于颈部切口闭合的Michel夹与近端夹的比较研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Jul;73(4):204-6.