Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mem Cognit. 2012 Feb;40(2):145-60. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0.
In a classic 1978 Memory & Cognition article, Geoff Loftus explained why noncrossover interactions are removable. These removable interactions are tied to the scale of measurement for the dependent variable and therefore do not allow unambiguous conclusions about latent psychological processes. In the present article, we present concrete examples of how this insight helps prevent experimental psychologists from drawing incorrect conclusions about the effects of forgetting and aging. In addition, we extend the Loftus classification scheme for interactions to include those on the cusp between removable and nonremovable. Finally, we use various methods (i.e., a study of citation histories, a questionnaire for psychology students and faculty members, an analysis of statistical textbooks, and a review of articles published in the 2008 issue of Psychology and Aging) to show that experimental psychologists have remained generally unaware of the concept of removable interactions. We conclude that there is more to interactions in a 2 × 2 design than meets the eye.
在 1978 年的《记忆与认知》杂志的一篇经典文章中,Geoff Loftus 解释了为什么非交叉相互作用是可移动的。这些可移动的相互作用与因变量的度量尺度有关,因此不能对潜在的心理过程做出明确的结论。在本文中,我们提供了具体的例子,说明这一观点如何帮助实验心理学家避免对遗忘和衰老的影响得出不正确的结论。此外,我们将 Loftus 的交互作用分类方案扩展到包括那些处于可移动和不可移动之间的交互作用。最后,我们使用各种方法(即对引文历史的研究、对心理学学生和教师的问卷调查、对统计教材的分析,以及对 2008 年《心理学与衰老》杂志上发表的文章的回顾)表明,实验心理学家普遍没有意识到可移动交互作用的概念。我们的结论是,2×2 设计中的交互作用不仅仅是表面上看到的那么简单。