Syrika Asimina, Nicolaidis Katerina, Edwards Jan, Beckman Mary E
University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Lang Speech. 2011 Sep;54(Pt 3):361-86. doi: 10.1177/0023830911402597.
Previous work on children's acquisition of complex sequences points to a tendency for affricates to be acquired before clusters, but there is no clear evidence of a difference in order of acquisition between clusters with /s/ that violate the Sonority Sequencing Principle (SSP), such as /s/ followed by stop in onset position, and other clusters that obey the SSP. One problem with studies that have compared the acquisition of SSP-obeying and SSP-violating clusters is that the component sounds in the two types of sequences were different.This paper examines the acquisition of initial /s/-stop and stop-/s/ sequences by sixty Greek children aged 2 through 5 years. Results showed greater accuracy for the /s/-stop relative to the stop-/s/ sequences, but no difference in accuracy between /ts/, which is usually analyzed as an affricate in Greek, and the other stop-/s/ sequences. Moreover, errors for the /s/-stop sequences and /ts/ primarily involved stop substitutions, whereas errors for /ps/ and /ks/ were more variable and often involved fricative substitutions, a pattern which may have a perceptual explanation. Finally, /ts/ showed a distinct temporal pattern relative to the stop-/s/ clusters /ps/ and /ks/, similar to what has been reported for productions of Greek adults.
先前关于儿童习得复杂序列的研究指出,塞擦音往往比辅音连缀先被习得,但对于违反响度顺序原则(SSP)的含/s/的辅音连缀(如起始位置/s/后接塞音)与其他遵循SSP的辅音连缀在习得顺序上的差异,并没有明确的证据。比较遵循SSP和违反SSP的辅音连缀习得情况的研究存在的一个问题是,这两种序列中的组成音不同。本文考察了60名2至5岁希腊儿童对词首/s/-塞音和塞音-/s/序列的习得情况。结果显示,/s/-塞音序列相对于塞音-/s/序列的准确率更高,但在希腊语中通常被分析为塞擦音的/ts/与其他塞音-/s/序列之间在准确率上没有差异。此外,/s/-塞音序列和/ts/的错误主要涉及塞音替代,而/ps/和/ks/的错误则更具可变性,且常常涉及擦音替代,这种模式可能有感知方面的解释。最后,/ts/相对于塞音-/s/辅音连缀/ps/和/ks/呈现出独特的时间模式,这与希腊成年人发音的相关报道类似。