• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为障碍、非行为障碍和多重残疾儿童,以及家庭外安置中断的风险。

Children with behavioral, non-behavioral, and multiple disabilities, and the risk of out-of-home placement disruption.

机构信息

Children and Family Research Center, School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1010 West Nevada Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Nov;35(11):956-64. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.06.004
PMID:22074756
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the relative risk of placement disruption for 3-10 year-old children placed in out-of-home care based on the biological relatedness of the placement caregiver and child disability status: no disability, a non-behavioral disability only, a behavioral disability only, or both a non-behavioral and behavioral disability.

METHODS

Data were used from the baseline and 36 month follow-up of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, a national probability study of children investigated for child abuse and neglect in the United States. Disability status was derived using several different nationally-normed measures of language development, daily-living skills, social skills, and behavioral problems.

RESULTS

Around 1 in 4 children placed in out-of-home care experienced a disruption. Placement with kin decreased the likelihood of disruption for a majority of children, and children with different types of disabilities were no more or less likely to disrupt in kinship care compared to children with no disability. Older children with a behavioral disability only or both a non-behavioral and behavioral disability were more likely to disrupt compared to younger regardless of placement.

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that maltreated children placed with kin will be afforded the same stability provided to children without a disability.

摘要

目的

本研究通过考察儿童残疾状况(无残疾、非行为残疾、行为残疾或同时存在非行为和行为残疾)与安置照顾者的生物亲缘关系,探讨了 3 至 10 岁儿童被安置在家庭以外照料机构中时的安置中断风险。

方法

数据来自美国全国儿童和青少年福利调查的基线和 36 个月随访,这是一项对遭受虐待和忽视的儿童进行调查的全国性概率研究。残疾状况是使用语言发展、日常生活技能、社会技能和行为问题的几种不同全国标准化测量方法得出的。

结果

大约 1/4 被安置在家庭以外照料机构的儿童经历了安置中断。对于大多数儿童来说,与亲属安置降低了中断的可能性,与无残疾的儿童相比,具有不同类型残疾的儿童在亲属照料中中断的可能性没有更高或更低。与年幼的儿童相比,只有行为残疾或同时存在非行为和行为残疾的年龄较大的儿童无论安置情况如何,中断的可能性都更高。

结论

研究结果表明,与亲属一起安置的受虐待儿童将获得与无残疾儿童相同的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Children with behavioral, non-behavioral, and multiple disabilities, and the risk of out-of-home placement disruption.行为障碍、非行为障碍和多重残疾儿童,以及家庭外安置中断的风险。
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Nov;35(11):956-64. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
2
Special health care needs among children in the child welfare system.儿童福利系统中儿童的特殊医疗保健需求。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e232-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3778.
3
Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care?谁会在寄养和亲属照料安置中受到干扰?
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Apr;30(4):409-24. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
4
The relationship between child disability and living arrangement in child welfare.儿童残疾与儿童福利中的生活安排之间的关系。
Child Welfare. 2006 Nov-Dec;85(6):965-84.
5
Do chronic conditions increase young children's risk of being maltreated?慢性病会增加幼儿受虐待的风险吗?
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jul;32(7):671-81. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.007. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
6
Health and home environments of caregivers of children investigated by child protective services.儿童保护服务机构调查的儿童照顾者的健康和家庭环境。
Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):273-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3814. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
7
A profile of children with disabilities receiving SSI: highlights from the National Survey of SSI Children and Families.领取补充保障收入的残疾儿童概况:来自全国补充保障收入儿童与家庭调查的要点
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(2):21-48.
8
Health of children adopted from Guatemala: comparison of orphanage and foster care.从危地马拉收养儿童的健康状况:孤儿院照料与寄养照料的比较
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e710-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2359.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Parental substance abuse and the development of children in family foster care.父母的药物滥用与家庭寄养儿童的成长
Child Welfare. 2001 Mar-Apr;80(2):239-56.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Socioeconomic Contextual Factors on Racial Differences in Foster Care Placement Stability.社会经济背景因素对寄养安置稳定性种族差异的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):1274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081274.
2
Risk and Protective Factors for African American Kinship Caregiving: A Scoping Review.非裔美国人亲属照料的风险与保护因素:一项范围综述
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2024 Jan;156. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107279. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Predictors of placement disruptions in foster care.寄养安置中断的预测因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Jan;99:104283. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104283. Epub 2019 Nov 22.