Kim Sohyun, Tak Sunghee H
College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
The Research Institute of Nursing Science · College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Jun;51(3):363-379. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21027.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) for nurses.
The English PCPI-S was translated into Korean with forward and backward translation. Data were collected from 338 nurses at one general hospital in Korea. Construct validity was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Known-group validity was also evaluated. Cronbach's α was used to assess the reliability.
The PCPI-S Korean version consisted of 51 items in three areas: prerequisites, the care environment, and person-centered process. The comparative fit index (CFI) and values of person-centered care process were improved after engagement and having sympathetic presence items were combined as one component. The construct validity of PCPI-S Korean version was verified using four-factor structures (.05 < RMSEA < .10, AGFI > .70, CFI > .70, and AIC). The convergent validity and discriminant validity of the entire PCPI-S question were verified using a two-factor structures (AVE > .50, construct reliability > .70). There was an acceptable known-group validity with a significant correlation between the PCPI-S level and the degree of person-centered care awareness and education. Internal consistency was reliable with Cronbach's α .95.
The Korean version of PCPI-S is valid and reliable. It can be used as a standardized Korean version of person-centered care measurement tool.
本研究旨在评估护士用韩文版以患者为中心的实践量表-员工版（PCPI-S）的有效性和可靠性。
英文PCPI-S经正向和反向翻译后转换为韩文。数据收集自韩国一家综合医院的338名护士。通过验证性因素分析、收敛效度和区分效度评估结构效度。还评估了已知群体效度。使用Cronbach's α评估可靠性。
韩文版PCPI-S由51个项目组成，涵盖三个领域：先决条件、护理环境和以患者为中心的过程。将参与和有同理心的项目合并为一个组成部分后，比较拟合指数（CFI）和以患者为中心的护理过程值得到改善。韩文版PCPI-S的结构效度通过四因素结构进行验证（.05 < RMSEA <.10，AGFI >.70，CFI >.70，AIC）。整个PCPI-S问题的收敛效度和区分效度通过双因素结构进行验证（AVE >.50，结构可靠性>.70）。PCPI-S水平与以患者为中心的护理意识和教育程度之间存在显著相关性，具有可接受的已知群体效度。内部一致性可靠，Cronbach's α为.95。
韩文版PCPI-S有效且可靠。它可以用作以患者为中心的护理测量工具的标准化韩文版本。
