Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;9(6):528-37. doi: 10.1370/afm.1297.
PURPOSE We wanted to determine whether an intervention based on patient activation and a physician decision support tool was more effective than usual care for improving adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. METHODS A 1-year cluster randomized controlled trial was performed using 30 primary care practices (4,105 patients) in southeastern New England. The main outcome was the percentage of patients screened for hyperlipidemia and treated to their low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol goals. RESULTS After 1 year of intervention, both randomized practice groups improved screening (89% screened), and 74% of patients in both groups were at their LDL and non-HDL cholesterol goals (P <.001). Using intent-to-treat analysis, we found no statistically significant differences between practice groups in screening or percentage of patients who achieved LDL and non-HDL cholesterol goals. Post hoc analysis showed practices who made high use of the patient activation kiosk were more likely to have patients screened (odds ratio [OR] = 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-3.27) compared with those who made infrequent or no use. Additionally, physicians who made high use of decision support tools were more likely to have their patients at their LDL cholesterol goals (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.50) and non-HDL goals (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.46) than low-use or no-use physicians. CONCLUSION This study showed null results with the intent-to-treat analysis regarding the benefits of a patient activation and a decision support tool in improving cholesterol management in primary care practices. Post hoc analysis showed a potential benefit in practices that used the e-health tools more frequently in screening and management of dyslipidemia. Further research on how to incorporate and increase adoption of user-friendly, patient-centered e-health tools to improve screening and management of chronic diseases and their risk factors is warranted.
目的 本研究旨在确定基于患者激活和医生决策支持工具的干预措施是否比常规护理更能有效提高对国家胆固醇教育计划指南的依从性。
方法 采用整群随机对照试验,在新英格兰东南部的 30 个初级保健机构(4105 例患者)中进行了为期 1 年的研究。主要结局是筛查高脂血症患者的比例以及将其低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和非高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇目标值降低的比例。
结果 干预 1 年后,两组随机分组的实践均改善了筛查(89%的患者进行了筛查),且两组中有 74%的患者达到了 LDL 和非-HDL 胆固醇目标值(P<0.001)。采用意向治疗分析,我们未发现两组在筛查或达到 LDL 和非-HDL 胆固醇目标值的患者比例方面存在统计学差异。事后分析表明,与使用频率较低或未使用患者激活信息亭的实践相比,高频率使用患者激活信息亭的实践更有可能对患者进行筛查(比值比[OR]为 2.54;95%置信区间[CI]为 1.97-3.27)。此外,高频率使用决策支持工具的医生更有可能使患者达到 LDL 胆固醇目标(OR=1.27;95%CI,1.07-1.50)和非-HDL 胆固醇目标(OR=1.23;95%CI,1.04-1.46),而低频率使用或不使用决策支持工具的医生则不然。
结论 本研究意向治疗分析结果显示,在改善初级保健实践中胆固醇管理方面,患者激活和决策支持工具没有益处。事后分析显示,在更频繁地使用电子健康工具进行筛查和管理血脂异常的实践中,可能存在潜在的益处。进一步研究如何采用用户友好、以患者为中心的电子健康工具来改善慢性病及其危险因素的筛查和管理是必要的。