Suppr超能文献

复合排气罩的集气罩入口系数。

Hood entry coefficients of compound exhaust hoods.

机构信息

Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory, University of North Alabama, Florence, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Dec;8(12):740-5. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.628605.

Abstract

A traditional method for assessing the flow rate in ventilation systems is based on multiple readings of velocity or velocity pressure (VP) (usually 10 or 20 points) taken in ductwork sections located away from fittings (> seven × diameters of straight duct). This study seeks to eliminate the need for a multiple-point evaluation and replace it with a simplified method that requires only a single measurement of hood static pressure (SP(h)) taken at a more accessible location (< three × diameters of straight duct from the hood entry). The SP(h) method is widely used for the assessment of flow rate in simple hoods. However, industrial applications quite often use compound hoods that are regularly of the slot/plenum type. For these hoods, a "compound coefficient of entry" has not been published, which makes the use of the hood static pressure method unfeasible. This study proposes a model for the computation of a "compound coefficient of entry" and validates the use of this model to assess flow rate in two systems of well-defined geometry (multi-slotted/plenum and single-slotted/tapered or "fish-tail" types). When using a conservative value of the slot loss factor (1.78), the proposed model yielded an estimate of the volumetric flow rate within 10% of that provided by a more comprehensive method of assessment. The simplicity of the hood static pressure method makes it very desirable, even in the upper range of experimental error found in this study.

摘要

评估通风系统流量的传统方法基于在远离配件的管道段(> 7 倍直管道直径)中进行的速度或速度压(VP)(通常为 10 或 20 个点)的多次读取。本研究旨在消除多点评估的需要,并将其替换为一种简化的方法,该方法仅需在更易接近的位置(< 直管道直径的三倍距离集气罩入口)测量集气罩静压(SP(h))。SP(h)方法广泛用于评估简单集气罩的流量。然而,工业应用经常使用复合集气罩,这些集气罩通常是槽/腔类型。对于这些集气罩,尚未公布“入口复合系数”,这使得使用集气罩静压方法不可行。本研究提出了一种计算“入口复合系数”的模型,并验证了该模型在两个具有明确定义几何形状的系统(多槽/腔和单槽/锥形或“鱼尾”类型)中评估流量的使用。当使用槽损耗系数(1.78)的保守值时,所提出的模型估计的体积流量在更全面的评估方法提供的流量的 10%以内。集气罩静压方法的简单性使其非常理想,即使在本研究中发现的实验误差上限范围内也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验