Suppr超能文献

确定与化学预防抗疟药物相关的严重不良反应风险。

Ascertainment of risk of serious adverse reactions associated with chemoprophylactic antimalarial drugs.

作者信息

Phillips-Howard P A, Bjorkman A B

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, England.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68(4):493-504.

Abstract

Serious adverse reactions during malaria chemoprophylaxis are reviewed. Three drugs considered to have caused serious reactions in recent years are pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine (Fansidar), pyrimethamine/dapsone (Maloprim) and amodiaquine. These reactions are principally independent of dose and cannot be determined during screening for optimal doses. However, host factors may precipitate dose-dependent reactions, some of which could be avoided with improvements in drug licensing. Since serious and life-threatening reactions are relatively rare (between 1:1000 and 1:20,000), Phase I to III trials cannot identify them. Reliance must therefore be placed on Phase IV post-marketing studies, including ongoing reviews of national registers, and specially tailored studies to identify the risk using prescription-event monitoring in high-risk populations. Occasionally, medical-record linkage, case-control and cohort studies may provide supportive data. Although large numbers of travellers must, of necessity, be exposed to a drug before relatively rare reactions are identified, the ascertainment of risk using post-marketing surveillance was prevented by the following five deficiencies: lack of awareness of early alerts, inadequate use of national registers, poor attention to epidemiological and statistical rigour, inadequate verification of denominators, and inadequacy of data records. Recommendations are given for minimizing such errors in the future.

摘要

本文综述了疟疾化学预防期间的严重不良反应。近年来,三种被认为会引起严重反应的药物分别是乙胺嘧啶/磺胺多辛(Fansidar)、乙胺嘧啶/氨苯砜(Maloprim)和阿莫地喹。这些反应主要与剂量无关,且无法在筛选最佳剂量的过程中确定。然而,宿主因素可能会引发剂量依赖性反应,其中一些反应可通过改进药品许可来避免。由于严重且危及生命的反应相对罕见(发生率在1:1000至1:20000之间),因此I至III期试验无法识别它们。因此,必须依靠IV期上市后研究,包括对国家登记册的持续审查,以及针对高风险人群使用处方事件监测来识别风险的专门定制研究。偶尔,病历关联、病例对照和队列研究可能会提供支持性数据。尽管在识别相对罕见的反应之前,大量旅行者必然会接触某种药物,但上市后监测在确定风险方面存在以下五个缺陷,从而阻碍了风险的确定:对早期警报缺乏认识、国家登记册使用不足、对流行病学和统计严谨性关注不够、分母核实不足以及数据记录不充分。文中给出了未来尽量减少此类错误的建议。

相似文献

10
Intermittent preventive treatment with antimalarial drugs.使用抗疟药物进行间歇性预防治疗。
Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):28-9; author reply 29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61953-4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.中毒性表皮坏死松解症
Br Med J. 1961 Feb 25;1(5225):550-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5225.550.
2
Agranulocytosis Following Dapsone Therapy.氨苯砜治疗后出现粒细胞缺乏症。
Br Med J. 1958 Feb 8;1(5066):324-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5066.324.
5
Fatal reaction to dapsone during treatment of leprosy.
Ann Intern Med. 1981 Jun;94(6):777-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-94-6-777.
6
Hypersensitivity reaction to dapsone: report from Malaysia.
Lepr Rev. 1984 Dec;55(4):385-9. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19840044.
8

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验