Suppr超能文献

高渗液在感染性休克患者中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照初步研究。

Hypertonic fluid administration in patients with septic shock: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

机构信息

Intensive Care Department, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Shock. 2012 Mar;37(3):268-75. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31823f152f.

Abstract

We assessed the short-term effects of hypertonic fluid versus isotonic fluid administration in patients with septic shock. This was a double-blind, prospective randomized controlled trial in a 15-bed intensive care unit. Twenty-four patients with septic shock were randomized to receive 250 mL 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch (HT group) or 500 mL 6% hydroxyethyl starch (IT group). Hemodynamic measurements included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), central venous pressure, stroke volume index, stroke volume variation, intrathoracic blood volume index, gastric tonometry, and sublingual microcirculatory flow as assessed by sidestream dark field imaging. Systolic tissue Doppler imaging velocities of the medial mitral annulus were measured using echocardiography to assess left ventricular contractility. Log transformation of the ratio MAP divided by the norepinephrine infusion rate (log MAP/NE) quantified the combined effect on both parameters. Compared with the IT group, hypertonic solution treatment resulted in an improvement in log MAP/NE (P = 0.008), as well as an increase in systolic tissue Doppler imaging velocities (P = 0.03) and stroke volume index (P = 0.017). No differences between the groups were found for preload parameters (central venous pressure, stroke volume variation, intrathoracic blood volume index) or for afterload parameters (systemic vascular resistance index, MAP). Hypertonic solution treatment decreased the need for ongoing fluid resuscitation (P = 0.046). No differences between groups were observed regarding tonometry or the sublingual microvascular variables. In patients with septic shock, hypertonic fluid administration did not promote gastrointestinal mucosal perfusion or sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in comparison to isotonic fluid. Independent of changes in preload or afterload, hypertonic fluid administration improved the cardiac contractility and vascular tone compared with isotonic fluid. The need for ongoing fluid resuscitation was also reduced.

摘要

我们评估了高渗液与等渗液在感染性休克患者中的短期作用。这是在一个 15 张床的重症监护病房进行的一项双盲、前瞻性随机对照试验。24 例感染性休克患者被随机分为 250 mL 7.2%NaCl/6%羟乙基淀粉(HT 组)或 500 mL 6%羟乙基淀粉(IT 组)。血流动力学测量包括平均动脉血压(MAP)、中心静脉压、每搏量指数、每搏量变异、胸腔内血容量指数、胃测压和舌下微循环血流,通过边流暗场成像进行评估。使用超声心动图测量内侧二尖瓣环的收缩组织多普勒成像速度,以评估左心室收缩力。MAP 除以去甲肾上腺素输注率的对数转换(log MAP/NE)量化了对这两个参数的综合影响。与 IT 组相比,高渗溶液治疗导致 log MAP/NE 改善(P = 0.008),以及收缩组织多普勒成像速度(P = 0.03)和每搏量指数(P = 0.017)增加。两组间前负荷参数(中心静脉压、每搏量变异、胸腔内血容量指数)或后负荷参数(全身血管阻力指数、MAP)无差异。高渗溶液治疗降低了持续液体复苏的需求(P = 0.046)。两组间测压或舌下微血管变量无差异。在感染性休克患者中,与等渗液相比,高渗液治疗并未促进胃肠黏膜灌注或舌下微循环血流。与等渗液相比,高渗液治疗独立于前负荷或后负荷的变化,改善了心肌收缩力和血管张力,同时也降低了持续液体复苏的需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验