• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用TRISS方法评估创伤及预测预后。

Evaluation of trauma and prediction of outcome using TRISS method.

作者信息

Singh Jaspal, Gupta Gulzar, Garg Ramneesh, Gupta Ashish

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

出版信息

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Oct;4(4):446-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.86626.

DOI:10.4103/0974-2700.86626
PMID:22090735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3214498/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), introduced in 1981 is a combination index based on revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS) and patient's age. In this study we have used TRISS method to predict the outcome in trauma cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1000 consecutive cases of trauma of adult age group admitted in casualty of Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhiana, from 1/7/2000 onwards. Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Age Index were recorded from which TRISS was determined. The performance of TS, ISS and TRISS as predictors of survival was evaluated using the misclassification rate, the information gain and the relative information gain.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients were men (83.7%) and in the age group of 20-50 years. Road traffic collisions (72%) were the most common cause of trauma. The mortality rate was 4.1%. Using PER method, the TRISS method was found to have information gain of 0.049 and a relative information gain of 0.41.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised trauma score (RTS) ranged from 2.746 to 7.8408.There was a graded increase in mortality with decreasing RTS score.

摘要

引言

创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)于1981年提出,是一种基于修正创伤评分(RTS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和患者年龄的综合指标。在本研究中,我们使用TRISS方法预测创伤病例的结局。

材料与方法

从2000年7月1日起,在卢迪亚纳Dayanand医学院和医院急诊室收治的1000例连续成年创伤病例。记录修正创伤评分、损伤严重程度评分和年龄指数,由此确定TRISS。使用错误分类率、信息增益和相对信息增益评估TS、ISS和TRISS作为生存预测指标的性能。

结果

大多数患者为男性(83.7%),年龄在20至50岁之间。道路交通事故(72%)是创伤最常见的原因。死亡率为4.1%。使用PER方法,发现TRISS方法的信息增益为0.049,相对信息增益为0.41。

结论

修正创伤评分(RTS)范围为2.746至7.8408。随着RTS评分降低,死亡率呈分级增加。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of trauma and prediction of outcome using TRISS method.使用TRISS方法评估创伤及预测预后。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Oct;4(4):446-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.86626.
2
Comparison of Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for Mortality Prediction in Elderly Trauma Patients.损伤严重度评分、新损伤严重度评分、修订创伤评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分在老年创伤患者死亡率预测中的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;23(2):73-77. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23120.
3
Use of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) as a Predictor of Patient Outcome in Cases of Trauma Presenting in the Trauma and Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Institute.在一家三级医疗机构的创伤与急诊科,使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)作为创伤病例患者预后的预测指标。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 14;15(6):e40410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40410. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Evaluation of ISS, RTS, CASS and TRISS scoring systems for predicting outcomes of blunt trauma abdomen.评估 ISS、RTS、CASS 和 TRISS 评分系统预测钝性腹部创伤结局的能力。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2021 Feb 11;93(2):9-15. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.7394.
5
Spectral analysis of heart rate variability for trauma outcome prediction: an analysis of 210 ICU multiple trauma patients.心率变异性的频谱分析用于创伤预后预测:对 210 例 ICU 多发创伤患者的分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01175-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay.损伤严重度评分(ISS)与创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)的终结:ICISS,一种基于国际疾病分类第九版的预测工具,在预测创伤患者的生存率、住院费用和住院时间方面优于ISS和TRISS。
J Trauma. 1998 Jan;44(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199801000-00003.
7
Validation of international trauma scoring systems in urban trauma centres in India.国际创伤评分系统在印度城市创伤中心的验证
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2459-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
8
Evaluation of emergency department admissions of mass casualty patients using the revised trauma score, injury severity score, and trauma and injury severity score.应用改良创伤评分、创伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分评估大批伤员患者的急诊科入院情况。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Mar;30(3):192-202. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.73531.
9
Validation of a base deficit-based trauma prediction model and comparison with TRISS and ASCOT.基于碱缺失的创伤预测模型的验证及与TRISS和ASCOT的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):627-633. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0592-y. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
10
The use of Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) at Siriraj Hospital: how accurate is it?诗里拉吉医院创伤评分-损伤严重度评分(TRISS)的应用:其准确性如何?
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Aug;92(8):1016-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlates of incident hypocalcemia amongst trauma patients in the Western Cape of South Africa: a secondary analysis of the Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care (EpiC) study.南非西开普省创伤患者中低钙血症发生的相关因素:长期创伤护理的流行病学与结局(EpiC)研究的二次分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 22;33(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01441-z.
2
Modeling trajectories of routine blood tests as dynamic biomarkers for outcome in spinal cord injury.将常规血液检测轨迹建模为脊髓损伤预后的动态生物标志物。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 22;8(1):470. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01782-0.
3
Incidence and outcomes of dysnatremia in crush injury patients admitted to Türkiye's largest hospital following the Kahramanmaraş earthquake.

本文引用的文献

1
Venous glucose and arterial lactate as biochemical predictors of mortality in clinically severely injured trauma patients--a comparison with ISS and TRISS.静脉血糖和动脉乳酸作为临床严重创伤患者死亡率的生化预测指标——与损伤严重度评分(ISS)和创伤严重度特征评分(TRISS)的比较
Injury. 2009 Jan;40(1):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.07.032. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
2
Evaluation of trauma care applying TRISS methodology in a Caribbean developing country.在一个加勒比发展中国家应用TRISS方法评估创伤护理
J Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.051. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
3
AIS 2005: a contemporary injury scale.
在加济安泰普地震后入住土耳其最大医院的挤压伤患者中,低钠血症的发生率及预后情况。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01165-w.
4
Application of urinary peptide-biomarkers in trauma patients as a predictive tool for prognostic assessment, treatment and intervention timing.尿肽生物标志物在创伤患者中的应用作为预后评估、治疗及干预时机的预测工具。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83878-3.
5
Prediction of Mortality and Outcome of Various Trauma Scores in Polytrauma Patients.多发伤患者中各种创伤评分对死亡率及预后的预测
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e69992. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69992. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Mortality Predictors in Trauma Patients: A Prospective Single-center Observational Study Assessing Injury Severity Score Revised Trauma Score Trauma and Injury Severity Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Scores.创伤患者死亡率预测指标的比较评估:一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究,评估损伤严重度评分、修订创伤评分、创伤和损伤严重度评分以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II评分。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 May;28(5):475-482. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24664.
7
Which curve is better? A comparative analysis of trauma scoring systems in a South Asian country.哪种曲线更好?对一个南亚国家创伤评分系统的比较分析。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Nov 22;8(1):e001171. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001171. eCollection 2023.
8
Evaluation of the predictive effects of trauma scoring systems in colorectal injuries.创伤评分系统对结直肠损伤的预测效果评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Feb;50(1):269-274. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02328-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
Use of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) as a Predictor of Patient Outcome in Cases of Trauma Presenting in the Trauma and Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Institute.在一家三级医疗机构的创伤与急诊科,使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)作为创伤病例患者预后的预测指标。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 14;15(6):e40410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40410. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Combination of Lactate and Base Deficit Levels at Admission to Predict Mortality in Blunt Trauma Patients.入院时乳酸水平与碱缺失水平联合预测钝性创伤患者的死亡率
Cureus. 2023 Jun 7;15(6):e40097. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40097. eCollection 2023 Jun.
《2005年简明损伤定级标准》:一种现代损伤分级标准
Injury. 2006 Dec;37(12):1083-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
4
Prediction of outcomes in trauma: anatomic or physiologic parameters?创伤预后的预测:解剖学参数还是生理学参数?
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Dec;201(6):891-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
5
Measuring trauma outcomes in India: an analysis based on TRISS methodology in a Mumbai university hospital.衡量印度的创伤治疗结果:基于TRISS方法对孟买一家大学医院的分析。
Injury. 2004 Apr;35(4):386-90. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00214-6.
6
Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system?预测多发伤后的预后:哪种评分系统?
Injury. 2004 Apr;35(4):347-58. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00140-2.
7
Prognostication and intensive care unit outcome: the evolving role of scoring systems.预后评估与重症监护病房结局:评分系统不断演变的作用。
Clin Chest Med. 2003 Dec;24(4):751-62. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(03)00094-7.
8
Trauma score systems: Cologne Validation Study.创伤评分系统:科隆验证研究。
J Trauma. 1997 Apr;42(4):652-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00012.
9
Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy.伤害流行病学进展作为公共政策的基础。
Public Health Rep. 1980 Sep-Oct;95(5):411-21.
10
Assessment of injury severity: the triage index.损伤严重程度评估:分诊指数
Crit Care Med. 1980 Apr;8(4):201-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198004000-00001.