• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临时导管用于血液透析的时间:巴西肾脏单位的观察性、前瞻性评估。

Duration of temporary catheter use for hemodialysis: an observational, prospective evaluation of renal units in Brazil.

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2011 Nov 17;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-63.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2369-12-63
PMID:22093280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3227575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For chronic hemodialysis, the ideal permanent vascular access is the arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Temporary catheters should be reserved for acute dialysis needs. The AVF is associated with lower infection rates, better clinical results, and a higher quality of life and survival when compared to temporary catheters. In Brazil, the proportion of patients with temporary catheters for more than 3 months from the beginning of therapy is used as an evaluation of the quality of renal units. The aim of this study is to evaluate factors associated with the time between the beginning of hemodialysis with temporary catheters and the placement of the first arteriovenous fistula in Brazil.

METHODS

This is an observational, prospective non-concurrent study using national administrative registries of all patients financed by the public health system who began renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 2000 and 2004 in Brazil. Incident patients were eligible who had hemodialysis for the first time. Patients were excluded who: had hemodialysis reportedly started after the date of death (inconsistent database); were younger than 18 years old; had HIV; had no record of the first dialysis unit; and were dialyzed in units with less than twenty patients. To evaluate individual and renal unit factors associated with the event of interest, the frailty model was used (N = 55,589).

RESULTS

Among the 23,824 patients (42.9%) who underwent fistula placement in the period of the study, 18.2% maintained the temporary catheter for more than three months until the fistula creation. The analysis identified five statistically significant factors associated with longer time until first fistula: higher age (Hazard-risk - HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00); having hypertension and cardiovascular diseases (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.9-0.98) as the cause of chronic renal disease; residing in capitals cities (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.9-0.95) and certain regions in Brazil - South (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.8-0.87), Midwest (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94), Northeast (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), or North (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94) and the type of renal unit (public or private).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring the provision of arteriovenous fistulas in renal units could improve the care given to patients with end stage renal disease.

摘要

背景

对于慢性血液透析,理想的永久性血管通路是动静脉瘘(AVF)。临时导管应保留用于急性透析需求。与临时导管相比,AVF 与较低的感染率、更好的临床结果以及更高的生活质量和生存率相关。在巴西,从开始治疗开始超过 3 个月的患者使用临时导管的比例被用作评估肾脏单位质量的指标。本研究的目的是评估巴西患者开始使用临时导管进行血液透析与首次放置动静脉瘘之间时间的相关因素。

方法

这是一项观察性、前瞻性非同期研究,使用巴西国家公共卫生系统资助的所有患者的所有患者的国家行政登记处,这些患者在 2000 年至 2004 年间开始接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。合格的患者是首次接受血液透析的患者。排除有以下情况的患者:据数据库记录显示,患者在死亡日期后开始血液透析(数据库不一致);年龄小于 18 岁;患有 HIV;没有首次透析单位的记录;在患者少于 20 人的单位进行透析。为了评估与感兴趣事件相关的个体和肾脏单位因素,使用脆弱性模型(N=55589)。

结果

在研究期间接受瘘管放置的 23824 名患者(42.9%)中,有 18.2%的患者将临时导管保留超过三个月,直到建立瘘管。分析确定了五个与首次瘘管形成时间较长相关的统计学显著因素:年龄较高(风险比- HR 0.99,95%CI 0.99-1.00);高血压和心血管疾病(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.9-0.98)是慢性肾病的病因;居住在首都城市(HR 0.92,95%CI 0.9-0.95)和巴西某些地区-南部(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.8-0.87),中西部(HR 0.88,95%CI 0.83-0.94),东北部(HR 0.91,95%CI 0.88-0.94)或北部(HR 0.88,95%CI 0.83-0.94)和肾脏单位类型(公共或私人)。

结论

监测肾脏单位中动静脉瘘的提供情况可以改善对终末期肾病患者的护理。

相似文献

1
Duration of temporary catheter use for hemodialysis: an observational, prospective evaluation of renal units in Brazil.临时导管用于血液透析的时间:巴西肾脏单位的观察性、前瞻性评估。
BMC Nephrol. 2011 Nov 17;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-63.
2
Patients started on hemodialysis with tunneled dialysis catheter have similar survival after arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft creation.开始使用带隧道的透析导管进行血液透析的患者,在动静脉内瘘和动静脉移植物建立后的生存率相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec;62(6):1590-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.076. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
3
Health status as a potential mediator of the association between hemodialysis vascular access and mortality.健康状况作为血液透析血管通路与死亡率之间关联的潜在中介因素。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Apr;29(4):892-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft438. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Predialysis nephrologic care and a functioning arteriovenous fistula at entry are associated with better survival in incident hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study.透析前的肾脏护理以及开始透析时功能良好的动静脉内瘘与初治血液透析患者更好的生存率相关:一项观察性队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Jun;43(6):999-1007. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.02.012.
5
Vascular Access Type and Clinical Outcomes among Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis.老年血液透析患者的血管通路类型与临床结局。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Nov 7;12(11):1823-1830. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01410217. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Disparities in early mortality among chronic kidney disease patients who transition to peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis with and without catheters.慢性肾脏病患者在转为腹膜透析和血液透析时,无论是否使用导管,早期死亡率存在差异。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 May;50(5):963-971. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1837-6. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Vascular access types in hemodialysis patients in palestine and factors affecting their distribution: A cross-sectional study.巴勒斯坦血液透析患者的血管通路类型及其分布的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019 Jan-Feb;30(1):166-174.
8
Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.血管通路的使用情况及结果:来自透析预后与实践模式研究的国际视角
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Oct;23(10):3219-26. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn261. Epub 2008 May 29.
9
Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS.欧美地区血管通路的使用情况:透析预后与实践模式研究(DOPPS)的结果
Kidney Int. 2002 Jan;61(1):305-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00117.x.
10
Catheter Dependence After Arteriovenous Fistula or Graft Placement Among Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis.老年血液透析患者动静脉瘘或移植物置管后的导管依赖。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Sep;78(3):399-408.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.12.019. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse clinical outcomes and associated factors among older adults undergoing hemodialysis in Brazil: A single-center experience.巴西老年血液透析患者的不良临床结局及相关因素:单中心经验
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0330030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330030. eCollection 2025.
2
Analysis of infection rates and duration of short and long-term hemodialysis catheters in a teaching hospital.教学医院短期和长期血液透析导管感染率及使用时长分析
J Vasc Bras. 2020 Sep 14;19:e20190142. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.190142. eCollection 2020.
3
Maturation of arteriovenous fistulas in patients with and without preexisting hemodialysis catheters.

本文引用的文献

1
[Democracy without equity: analysis of health reform and nineteen years of National Health System in Brazil].[没有公平的民主:巴西卫生改革及国家卫生系统十九年分析]
Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Jan;15(1):171-83. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000100023.
2
Planned creation of vascular access saves medical expenses for incident dialysis patients.计划性血管通路建立可节省急诊透析患者的医疗费用。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009 Oct;25(10):521-9. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70544-3.
3
Baseline characteristics of an incident haemodialysis population in Spain: results from ANSWER--a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study.
有或无预先存在的血液透析导管的患者动静脉内瘘的成熟情况。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Oct 11;48:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.008. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Comparison of vascular access use in hemodialysis patients in Isfahan in 2003 and 2013.2003年与2013年伊斯法罕血液透析患者血管通路使用情况的比较。
Indian J Nephrol. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.134656.
5
Re-envisioning Fistula First in a patient-centered culture.以患者为中心的文化重新构想瘘管优先。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Oct;8(10):1791-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03140313. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
西班牙新入组血液透析人群的基线特征:ANSWER研究结果——一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Feb;24(2):578-88. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn464. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
4
[Changes in vascular access in a dialysis unit in recent years: planning problems, change in preferences, or demographic change?].[近年来透析单元血管通路的变化:规划问题、偏好改变还是人口结构变化?]
Nefrologia. 2008;28(5):531-8.
5
Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.血管通路的使用情况及结果:来自透析预后与实践模式研究的国际视角
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Oct;23(10):3219-26. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn261. Epub 2008 May 29.
6
EBPG on Vascular Access.血管通路的欧洲最佳实践指南
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 May;22 Suppl 2:ii88-117. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm021.
7
Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD (CHOICE) Study.新接受血液透析患者的血管通路类型与生存率:关爱终末期肾病患者健康结局的选择(CHOICE)研究
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 May;16(5):1449-55. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004090748. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
8
Regional differences in the provision of adult renal dialysis services in the UK.英国成人肾透析服务提供方面的地区差异。
QJM. 2005 Mar;98(3):183-90. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci023.
9
Survival of hemodialysis patients: modeling differences in risk of dialysis centers.血液透析患者的生存率:透析中心风险差异建模。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Jun;15(3):189-96. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg035.
10
National profile of practice patterns for hemodialysis vascular access in the United States.美国血液透析血管通路的全国实践模式概况
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Aug;13(8):2117-24. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000022422.79790.a8.