The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 212 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
J Safety Res. 2011 Oct;42(5):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
Crossover and rollover crashes in earth-divided, traversable medians on rural divided highways can lead to severe injury outcomes. This study estimated severity models of these two crash types. Vehicle, driver, roadway, and median cross-section design data were factors considered in the models. A unique aspect of the data used to estimate the models were the availability of median cross-slope data, which are not commonly included in roadway inventory data files.
A binary logit model of cross-median crash severity and a multinomial logit model of rollover crash severity were estimated using five years of data from rural divided highways in Pennsylvania.
The highest probability of a fatal or major injury in cross-median and rollover crashes was found to occur in cases when a driver was not wearing a seatbelt. While flatter cross-slopes and narrower medians were associated with more severe cross-median crash outcomes, steeper cross-slopes and narrower medians significantly increased rollover crash severity outcomes. The presence of horizontal curves was associated with increased probabilities of high-severity outcomes in a median rollover crash.
Modeling results in this study confirmed that cross-median and median rollover crash severity outcomes are associated with median cross-section design characteristics. Based on the estimated models, it appears that flatter and narrower medians lead to more severe injury outcomes in cross-median crashes. Steeper median cross-slopes and narrower medians were associated with higher probabilities of more severe outcomes in median rollover crashes. The results presented in this study suggest that there is a trade-off between median cross-section design and cross-median and rollover crashes in earth-divided, traversable medians on rural divided highways. While the severity models can be included in a framework to develop design guidance in relation to this trade-off, models of crash frequency should also be considered.
在农村分向公路的可穿越中央分隔带中,十字交叉和翻车碰撞会导致严重的伤害后果。本研究旨在建立这两种碰撞类型的严重程度模型。模型中考虑了车辆、驾驶员、道路和中央分隔带横断面设计数据等因素。用于估计模型的数据的一个独特方面是中央分隔带横坡数据的可用性,这些数据通常不包含在道路清单数据文件中。
利用宾夕法尼亚州农村分向公路五年的数据,采用二元逻辑模型和多项逻辑模型分别对十字交叉碰撞和翻车碰撞的严重程度进行了估计。
研究发现,在驾驶员未系安全带的情况下,十字交叉和翻车碰撞中发生致命或重伤的概率最高。较平坦的横坡和较窄的中央分隔带与更严重的十字交叉碰撞后果相关,而较陡的横坡和较窄的中央分隔带则显著增加了翻车碰撞的严重程度后果。存在平曲线会增加中央分隔带翻车碰撞中高严重程度后果的发生概率。
本研究的建模结果证实,十字交叉和中央分隔带翻车碰撞的严重程度结果与中央分隔带横断面设计特征有关。根据估计的模型,似乎较平坦和较窄的中央分隔带会导致十字交叉碰撞中更严重的伤害后果。较陡的中央分隔带横坡和较窄的中央分隔带与中央分隔带翻车碰撞中更严重后果的发生概率较高有关。本研究结果表明,在农村分向公路的可穿越中央分隔带中,中央分隔带横断面设计与十字交叉和翻车碰撞之间存在权衡。虽然严重程度模型可以纳入框架中,以制定与这种权衡相关的设计指南,但也应考虑碰撞频率模型。