Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center of Molecular Medicine, Medical University of Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012 Apr 28;353(1-2):114-27. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.10.033. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
Mitochondrial Ca(2+) sequestration is a well-known process that is involved in various physiological and pathological mechanisms. Using isolated suspended mitochondria one unique mitochondrial Ca(2+) uniporter was considered to account ubiquitously for the transfer of Ca(2+) into these organelles. However, by applying alternative techniques for measuring mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake evidences for molecularly distinct mitochondrial Ca(2+) carriers accumulated recently. Herein we compared different methodical approaches of studying mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake. Patch clamp technique on mitoplasts from endothelial and HeLa cells revealed the existence of three and two mitoplast Ca(2+) currents (I(CaMito)), respectively. According to their conductance, these channels were named small (s-), intermediate (i-), large (l-) and extra-large (xl-) mitoplast Ca(2+) currents (MCC). i-MCC was found in mitoplasts of both cell types whereas s-MCC and l-MCC or xl-MCC were/was exclusively found in mitoplasts from endothelial cells or HeLa cells. The comparison of mitochondrial Ca(2+) signals, measured either indirectly by sensing extra-mitochondrial Ca(2+) or directly by recording changes of the matrix Ca(2+), showed different Ca(2+) sensitivities of the distinct mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake routes. Subpopulations of mitochondria with different Ca(2+) uptake capacities in intact endothelial cells could be identified using Rhod-2/AM. In contrast, cells expressing mitochondrial targeted pericam or cameleon (4mtD3cpv) showed homogeneous mitochondrial Ca(2+) signals in response to cell stimulation. The comparison of different experimental approaches and protocols using isolated organelles, permeabilized and intact cells, pointed to cell-type specific and versatile pathways for mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake. Moreover, this work highlights the necessity of the utilization of multiple technical approaches to study the complexity of mitochondrial Ca(2+) homeostasis.
线粒体钙摄取是一种众所周知的过程,涉及各种生理和病理机制。使用分离的悬浮线粒体,人们认为有一种独特的线粒体钙单向转运体普遍负责将钙转运到这些细胞器中。然而,通过应用替代技术测量线粒体钙摄取,最近积累了分子上不同的线粒体钙载体的证据。本文比较了研究线粒体钙摄取的不同方法学方法。内皮细胞和 HeLa 细胞线粒体线粒体的膜片钳技术揭示了存在三种和两种线粒体钙电流(I(CaMito))。根据它们的电导,这些通道分别命名为小(s-)、中(i-)、大(l-)和超大(xl-)线粒体钙电流(MCC)。i-MCC 在内皮细胞和 HeLa 细胞的线粒体中均有发现,而 s-MCC 和 l-MCC 或 xl-MCC 仅在内皮细胞或 HeLa 细胞的线粒体中发现。通过检测细胞外线粒体钙间接测量或通过记录基质钙变化直接测量线粒体钙信号的比较表明,不同的线粒体钙摄取途径具有不同的钙敏感性。使用 Rhod-2/AM 可以在完整的内皮细胞中鉴定具有不同钙摄取能力的线粒体亚群。相比之下,表达线粒体靶向的 percam 或 cameleon(4mtD3cpv)的细胞在受到细胞刺激时显示出同质的线粒体钙信号。使用分离的细胞器、通透化和完整细胞比较不同的实验方法和方案,指出了线粒体钙摄取的细胞类型特异性和多样化途径。此外,这项工作强调了利用多种技术方法研究线粒体钙稳态复杂性的必要性。