Suppr超能文献

使用 6 自由度图像引导系统集成平台的颅立体定向放射治疗中专用与常规面罩固定的位置准确性和稳定性的临床比较。

Clinical comparison of positional accuracy and stability between dedicated versus conventional masks for immobilization in cranial stereotactic radiotherapy using 6-degree-of-freedom image guidance system-integrated platform.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2012 Feb;102(2):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the positioning accuracy and stability of two distinct noninvasive immobilization devices, a dedicated (D-) and conventional (C-) mask, and to evaluate the applicability of a 6-degrees-of-freedom (6D) correction, especially to the C-mask, based on our initial experience with cranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) using ExacTrac (ET)/Robotics integrated into the Novalis Tx platform.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The D- and C-masks were the BrainLAB frameless mask system and a general thermoplastic mask used for conventional radiotherapy such as whole brain irradiation, respectively. A total of 148 fractions in 71 patients and 125 fractions in 20 patients were analyzed for the D- and C-masks, respectively. For the C-mask, 3D correction was applied to the initial 10 patients, and thereafter, 6D correction was adopted. The 6D residual errors (REs) in the initial setup, after correction (pre-treatment), and during post-treatment were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The D-mask provided no significant benefit for initial setup. The post-treatment median 3D vector displacements (interquatile range) were 0.38 mm (0.22, 0.60) and 0.74 mm (0.49, 1.04) for the D- and C-masks, respectively (p<0.001). The post-treatment maximal translational REs were within 1 mm and 2 mm for the D- and C-masks, respectively, and notably within 1.5 mm for the C-mask with 6D correction. The pre-treatment 3D vector displacements were significantly correlated with those for post-treatment in both masks.

CONCLUSIONS

The D-mask confers positional stability acceptable for SRT. For the C-mask, 6D correction is also recommended, and an additional setup margin of 0.5 mm to that for the D-mask would be sufficient. The tolerance levels for the pre-treatment REs should similarly be set as small as possible for both systems.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同的无创固定装置(专用[D-]和常规[C-]面罩)的定位准确性和稳定性,并评估基于我们在 Novalis Tx 平台上使用 ExacTrac(ET)/机器人进行颅立体定向放射治疗(SRT)的初步经验,对 6 自由度(6D)校正的适用性,特别是对 C 面罩的适用性。

材料和方法

D-和 C-面罩分别为 BrainLAB 无框架面罩系统和用于全脑照射等常规放疗的普通热塑面罩。分别对 71 例患者的 148 个分次和 20 例患者的 125 个分次进行了 D-和 C-面罩的分析。对于 C-面罩,对前 10 例患者进行了 3D 校正,此后采用了 6D 校正。测量并比较了初始设置、校正后(治疗前)和治疗期间的 6D 残余误差(RE)。

结果

D-面罩在初始设置中没有显著优势。治疗后中位数 3D 向量位移(四分位距)分别为 0.38mm(0.22,0.60)和 0.74mm(0.49,1.04),分别为 D-和 C-面罩(p<0.001)。治疗后最大平移 RE 分别在 1mm 和 2mm 以内,对于 C-面罩,6D 校正后也在 1.5mm 以内。治疗前的 3D 向量位移与两种面罩的治疗后位移显著相关。

结论

D-面罩为 SRT 提供了可接受的位置稳定性。对于 C-面罩,也建议使用 6D 校正,并且对于 C-面罩,需要比 D-面罩增加 0.5mm 的设置余量。对于这两种系统,治疗前 RE 的容限水平也应尽可能小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验