Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Ageing Res Rev. 2012 Jan;11(1):136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
This is the first meta-analysis focusing on elderly patients with mobility problems, physical disability and/or multi-morbidity. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of physical exercise therapy on mobility, physical functioning, physical activity and quality of life. A broad systematic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PEDro and The Cochrane Library. Relevant study characteristics were reviewed and meta-analyses using standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed. The results show that physical exercise therapy has a positive effect on mobility (SMD final value: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.30; SMD change value: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.10) and physical functioning (SMD final value: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.46; SMD change value: 2.93; 95% CI: 2.50, 3.36). High-intensity exercise interventions seem to be somewhat more effective in improving physical functioning than low-intensity exercise interventions (SMD final value: 0.22; 95% CI: -0.17, 0.62; SMD change value: 0.38; 95% CI: -0.48, 1.25). These positive effects are of great value for older adults who are already physically impaired. The effect on physical activity and quality of life was not evident and no definite conclusions on the most effective type of physical exercise therapy intervention can be drawn.
这是第一项专注于行动不便、身体残疾和/或多病共存的老年患者的荟萃分析。本研究旨在评估身体运动疗法对行动能力、身体机能、身体活动和生活质量的影响。在 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PEDro 和 The Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了广泛的系统文献检索。回顾了相关研究特征,并使用标准化均数差(SMD)进行了荟萃分析。结果表明,身体运动疗法对行动能力(最终 SMD 值:0.18;95%CI:0.05,0.30;SMD 变化值:0.82;95%CI:0.54,1.10)和身体机能(最终 SMD 值:0.27;95%CI:0.08,0.46;SMD 变化值:2.93;95%CI:2.50,3.36)具有积极影响。高强度运动干预似乎比低强度运动干预更有效地改善身体机能(最终 SMD 值:0.22;95%CI:-0.17,0.62;SMD 变化值:0.38;95%CI:-0.48,1.25)。这些积极影响对身体已经受损的老年人非常有价值。身体活动和生活质量的影响不明显,因此无法得出关于最有效的身体运动疗法干预类型的明确结论。