Suppr超能文献

大都市脊柱侧弯筛查项目中里塞尔征的观察者间和观察者内可靠性

Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Risser sign in a metropolitan scoliosis screening program.

作者信息

Hammond Kyle E, Dierckman Brian D, Burnworth Laura, Meehan Peter L, Oswald Timothy S

机构信息

Emory University Department of Orthopedics, Egelston Children's Hospital of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Dec;31(8):e80-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318236b1c9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risser staging is one of several criteria used in scoliosis screening programs. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a radiologist's Risser interpretations from a large metropolitan scoliosis-screening program when compared to interpretations of 2 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons and 2 orthopaedic residents.

METHODS

During the 2008 to 2009 school year, 275 students were reviewed as part of a metropolitan scoliosis-screening program. 100 of the radiographs were randomly chosen and de-identified for inclusion. Two attending orthopaedic surgeons and 2 orthopaedic residents independently interpreted the films on 3 occasions and assigned each a Risser stage. Inter- and intra-rater analyses using Kappa statistics were performed to determine the reliability of the Risser stage interpretations between the orthopaedic surgeons and the radiologist as well as the reliability of the interpretations among the individual surgeons.

RESULTS

Inter-rater kappa values for the attending surgeons and the radiologist averaged 0.526. Inter-rater kappa values for the resident surgeons and the radiologist averaged 0.490 and 0.101. There was significant agreement between the attending surgeons on all 3 occasions (κ = 0.764, 0.809, 0.837). The intra-rater reliability among the attending surgeons (κ = 0.988, 0.957) and the resident surgeons (κ = 0.813, 0.495) showed statistical significance (P < 0.0001). Only half of the films had perfect agreement between the radiologist and the surgeons and 28% of the films were interpreted with a difference of 2 or more Risser stages. The radiologist did not interpret any of the films as a Risser 4 or 5 but 21% of the films were interpreted as a 4 or 5 by the orthopaedic surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoliosis-screening program utilizes a referral pathway based on the radiologist's Risser stage interpretation in conjunction with the Cobb angle. The radiologist and the orthopaedic surgeons demonstrated only moderate agreement in their interpretations of Risser stages, resulting in a possible 21% over-referral rate. This study questions the efficacy of using the Risser stage as part of a large metropolitan scoliosis screening program and warrants further investigation.

摘要

背景

里塞尔分级是脊柱侧弯筛查项目中使用的几种标准之一。本研究旨在评估与两名儿科骨科医生和两名骨科住院医师的解读相比,一位放射科医生对一个大型都市脊柱侧弯筛查项目中里塞尔分级解读的可靠性。

方法

在2008至2009学年,作为一个都市脊柱侧弯筛查项目的一部分,对275名学生进行了检查。随机选择100张X光片并去除标识后纳入研究。两名骨科主治医生和两名骨科住院医师独立对这些片子进行了3次解读,并为每张片子指定一个里塞尔分级。使用卡方统计进行了评分者间和评分者内分析,以确定骨科医生和放射科医生之间里塞尔分级解读的可靠性以及各医生个体解读的可靠性。

结果

主治医生与放射科医生之间的评分者间卡方值平均为0.526。住院医师与放射科医生之间的评分者间卡方值平均为0.490和0.101。主治医生在所有3次解读中都有显著一致性(κ = 0.764、0.809、0.837)。主治医生(κ = 0.988、0.957)和住院医师(κ = 0.813、0.495)的评分者内可靠性具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。只有一半的片子在放射科医生和外科医生之间有完全一致的解读,28%的片子解读的里塞尔分级相差2级或更多。放射科医生没有将任何一张片子解读为里塞尔4级或5级,但骨科医生将21%的片子解读为4级或5级。

结论

脊柱侧弯筛查项目采用基于放射科医生里塞尔分级解读并结合科布角的转诊途径。放射科医生和骨科医生在里塞尔分级解读上仅表现出中等程度的一致性,导致可能有21%的转诊率过高。本研究对将里塞尔分级用作大型都市脊柱侧弯筛查项目的一部分的有效性提出质疑,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验