• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Primary Care Physiotherapy in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Longitudinal Observational Study.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者初级保健物理治疗的临床特征及患者报告结局:一项纵向观察性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 28;14:1733-1750. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S262578. eCollection 2020.
2
Relationships Between Context, Process, and Outcome Indicators to Assess Quality of Physiotherapy Care in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Applying Donabedian's Model of Care.颈部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者物理治疗质量评估中背景、过程和结果指标之间的关系:应用唐纳贝迪安护理模式
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 2;14:425-442. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S234800. eCollection 2020.
3
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
4
Improved quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Results based on 16 years of routinely collected data.挥鞭样相关疾病患者物理治疗护理质量的改善:基于16年常规收集数据的结果
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 30;3:929385. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.929385. eCollection 2022.
5
Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders.颈部功能障碍指数、诺斯威克公园颈部疼痛问卷以及问题引出技术在测量挥鞭样损伤相关疾病所致残疾方面的有效性。
Pain. 2003 Apr;102(3):273-281. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00406-2.
6
Recommendations for a core outcome measurement set for clinical trials in whiplash associated disorders.推荐用于颈部扭伤相关疾病临床试验的核心结局测量集。
Pain. 2023 Oct 1;164(10):2265-2272. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002926. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
StressModEx--Physiotherapist-led Stress Inoculation Training integrated with exercise for acute whiplash injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.应激模式训练——由物理治疗师主导的应激接种训练与运动相结合用于急性挥鞭伤:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):157. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
8
Trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy and exercise for chronic whiplash: protocol of a randomised, controlled trial.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法与运动治疗慢性挥鞭伤:一项随机对照试验方案
J Physiother. 2015 Oct;61(4):218. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
Has the quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) improved over time? A retrospective study using routinely collected data and quality indicators.随着时间的推移,挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者的物理治疗质量是否有所改善?一项使用常规收集的数据和质量指标的回顾性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Nov 8;12:2291-2308. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S179808. eCollection 2018.
10
Superior outcomes following cervical fusion vs. multimodal rehabilitation in a subgroup of randomized Whiplash-Associated-Disorders (WAD) patients indicating somatic pain origin-Comparison of outcome assessments made by four examiners from different disciplines.在一组随机分组的挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者中,颈椎融合术与多模式康复治疗相比,在提示躯体性疼痛起源的亚组中疗效更佳——四位来自不同学科的检查者所做的疗效评估比较
Scand J Pain. 2018 Apr 25;18(2):175-186. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0180.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and Consequences of Direct Access in Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review.物理治疗中直接就诊的有效性及影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 7;12(18):5832. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185832.
2
Exploratory Study of Associations and Agreement between Prognostic Patient-Registered Factors, Physiotherapists' Intuitive Synthesis, and Patient-Reported Factors in Whiplash-Associated Disorders.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病中患者登记的预后因素、物理治疗师的直观综合判断与患者报告因素之间的关联及一致性的探索性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2330. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062330.
3
Improved quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Results based on 16 years of routinely collected data.挥鞭样相关疾病患者物理治疗护理质量的改善:基于16年常规收集数据的结果
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 30;3:929385. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.929385. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationships Between Context, Process, and Outcome Indicators to Assess Quality of Physiotherapy Care in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Applying Donabedian's Model of Care.颈部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者物理治疗质量评估中背景、过程和结果指标之间的关系:应用唐纳贝迪安护理模式
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 2;14:425-442. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S234800. eCollection 2020.
2
Prospective Cohort Study of Patients With Neck Pain in a Manual Therapy Setting: Design and Baseline Measures.手法治疗环境下颈痛患者的前瞻性队列研究:设计与基线测量
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Sep;42(7):471-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
3
Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.物理治疗师在管理肌肉骨骼疾病时是否遵循基于证据的指南?系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e032329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329.
4
Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 4: Neck Pain.慢性疼痛的最佳证据康复治疗 第4部分:颈部疼痛
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 15;8(8):1219. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081219.
5
Development of a standard set of outcome measures for non-specific low back pain in Dutch primary care physiotherapy practices: a Delphi study.制定荷兰初级保健物理治疗实践中非特异性下腰痛的标准结局测量集:一项德尔菲研究。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jul;28(7):1550-1564. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05962-x. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
6
Has the quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) improved over time? A retrospective study using routinely collected data and quality indicators.随着时间的推移,挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者的物理治疗质量是否有所改善?一项使用常规收集的数据和质量指标的回顾性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Nov 8;12:2291-2308. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S179808. eCollection 2018.
7
Predictors for global perceived effect after physiotherapy in patients with neck pain: an observational study.颈痛患者物理治疗后整体感知疗效的预测因素:一项观察性研究。
Physiotherapy. 2018 Dec;104(4):400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization.患者报告结局在临床试验中的重要性及未来优化策略。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018 Nov 1;9:353-367. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156279. eCollection 2018.
9
Symptoms, disabilities, and life satisfaction five years after whiplash injuries.挥鞭伤五年后的症状、残疾情况及生活满意度
Scand J Pain. 2014 Oct 1;5(4):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.06.001.
10
Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy Assessment and Treatment in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.临床实践指南:物理治疗评估与治疗非特异性颈痛患者。
Phys Ther. 2018 Mar 1;98(3):162-171. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx118.

挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者初级保健物理治疗的临床特征及患者报告结局:一项纵向观察性研究

Clinical Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Primary Care Physiotherapy in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

作者信息

Oostendorp Rob A B, Elvers J W Hans, van Trijffel Emiel, Rutten Geert M, Scholten-Peeters Gwendolyne G M, Heijmans Marcel, Hendriks Erik, Mikolajewska Emilia, De Kooning Margot, Laekeman Marjan, Nijs Jo, Roussel Nathalie, Samwel Han

机构信息

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Manual Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 28;14:1733-1750. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S262578. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S262578
PMID:33061316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7532902/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) constitute a state of health characterized by a wide diversity of symptoms as a result of impairments of functions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) seem appropriate when describing and evaluating the health status of patients with WAD.

AIM

To measure the use of PROMs and PROs as quality indicators in clinical reasoning, and to analyze and evaluate pre- and post-treatment 'pain intensity' and 'functioning', and for 'perceived improvement' in patients with WAD in primary care physiotherapy practice by year of referral, with the phase after accident and prognostic health profile embedded in the clinical reasoning process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected over a period of 10 years. Pain intensity, functioning, and perceived improvement were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-P), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Global Perceived Effect scale (GPE). Pre- and post-treatment mean differences were tested for statistical significance and compared to minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Effect sizes were expressed as Cohen's d. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to explore independent associations of year of referral, phase after the accident, and the patient's prognostic health profile with post-treatment pain intensity and functioning.

RESULTS

A consecutive sample of 523 patients was included. Pre- and post-treatment mean differences on VAS-P and NDI were statistically significant (<0.000) and clinically relevant, with 'large' effect sizes for pain intensity and functioning. MCIDs were achieved by 80% for VAS-P and for 60% for NDI. Year of referral and phase after the accident were independently associated with worse post-treatment functioning. About half of the patients (n=241 [46.1%]) perceived themselves as improved.

CONCLUSION

The PROMs and PROs pain intensity, functioning and perceived improvement were integrated as quality indicators in the physiotherapy clinical reasoning process for patients with WAD. Significant differences in pain intensity and functioning were found but were unrelated to year of referral, phase after whiplash-related injury or prognostic health profile. The MCID VAS-P scores did not differ depending on experienced pain.

摘要

背景

挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WADs)是一种健康状态,其特征是由于功能受损、活动受限和参与受限而出现各种各样的症状。在描述和评估WAD患者的健康状况时,患者报告的结局测量指标(PROMs)和患者报告的结局(PROs)似乎是合适的。

目的

在基层物理治疗实践中,通过转诊年份,测量PROMs和PROs作为临床推理质量指标的使用情况,并分析和评估WAD患者治疗前和治疗后的“疼痛强度”和“功能”,以及“感知改善”情况,同时将事故后阶段和预后健康状况纳入临床推理过程。

材料与方法

数据收集历时10年。使用疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-P)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)和总体感知效果量表(GPE)测量疼痛强度、功能和感知改善情况。对治疗前和治疗后的平均差异进行统计学显著性检验,并与最小临床重要差异(MCID)进行比较。效应大小用科恩d值表示。进行多变量回归分析,以探讨转诊年份、事故后阶段和患者预后健康状况与治疗后疼痛强度和功能的独立关联。

结果

纳入了523例连续样本患者。VAS-P和NDI治疗前和治疗后的平均差异具有统计学显著性(<0.000)且具有临床相关性,疼痛强度和功能的效应大小为“大”。VAS-P的MCID达成率为80%,NDI的达成率为60%。转诊年份和事故后阶段与治疗后较差的功能独立相关。约一半的患者(n = 241 [46.1%])认为自己有所改善。

结论

PROMs和PROs中的疼痛强度、功能和感知改善被整合为WAD患者物理治疗临床推理过程中的质量指标。发现疼痛强度和功能有显著差异,但与转诊年份、挥鞭样损伤相关损伤后的阶段或预后健康状况无关。VAS-P的MCID评分不因经历的疼痛而有所不同。