Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):503-17. doi: 10.1037/a0026264. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
Using exploratory structural equation modeling and multiple regression, we examined the factor structure and criterion relations of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO; Kernberg & Clarkin, 1995) in a nonclinical sample. Participants (N = 1,260) completed the IPO and measures of self-concept clarity, defenses, affect and emotion regulation, and risky and self-injurious behavior. In contrast to that of Lenzenweger, Clarkin, Kernberg, and Foelsch (2001), a 4-factor measurement model was derived with factors representing instability of sense of self and other, instability of goals, instability of behaviors, and psychosis. The 1st of these factors related most strongly to external measures of self-concept clarity, defenses, and affect, whereas the 3rd factor related most strongly to measures of risky behavior and self-injury. These results suggest that the IPO's factor structure does not conform to the hypothesized 3-factor model, although it does capture important elements of Kernberg's (1996) theory of personality organization, especially the central construct of representations of self and others. The results point to several areas in which the IPO might be refined to provide a more comprehensive and theoretically appropriate measure of the borderline personality organization construct.
我们使用探索性结构方程建模和多元回归,在非临床样本中检验了人格组织量表(IPO;Kernberg 和 Clarkin,1995)的主要量表的因素结构和标准关系。参与者(N=1260)完成了 IPO 以及自我概念清晰度、防御机制、情感和情绪调节、冒险和自我伤害行为的测量。与 Lenzenweger、Clarkin、Kernberg 和 Foelsch(2001)的研究不同,我们得出了一个 4 因素测量模型,该模型的因素代表自我和他人的感觉不稳定、目标不稳定、行为不稳定和精神病。第一个因素与自我概念清晰度、防御机制和情感的外部测量最相关,而第三个因素与冒险行为和自我伤害的测量最相关。这些结果表明,IPO 的因素结构不符合假设的 3 因素模型,但它确实捕捉到了 Kernberg(1996)人格组织理论的重要元素,尤其是自我和他人的代表性的核心构建。结果指出了几个可能需要改进的领域,以便为边缘型人格组织结构提供更全面和理论上适当的测量。