Suppr超能文献

人格组织量表-现实测试分量表和科学信仰量表:思维方式测量的验证性因素和 Rasch 分析。

The Inventory of Personality Organization-Reality Testing Subscale and Belief in Science Scale: Confirmatory factor and Rasch analysis of thinking style measures.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0310055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310055. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The Inventory of Personality Organization-Reality Testing Subscale (IPO-RT) and Belief in Science Scale (BIS) represent indirect, proxy measures of intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking. However, a limited appraisal of factorial structure exists, and assessment of person-item functioning has not occurred. This study assessed the IPO-RT and BIS using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis with a sample of 1030 participants (465 males, 565 females). Correlation analysis revealed a negative, moderate relationship between the measures. CFA supported a bifactorial model of the IPO-RT with four bifactors (Auditory and Visual Hallucinations, Delusional Thinking, Social Deficits, and Confusion). A one-factor model best fitted the BIS. Satisfactory item/person reliability and unidimensionality was observed for both measures using Rasch analysis, and items generally exhibited gender invariance. However, IPO-RT items were challenging, whereas BIS items were relatively easy to endorse. Overall, results indicated that the IPO-RT and BIS are conceptually sound, indirect indices of intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking. Acknowledging the breadth of these thinking styles, a useful future research focus includes evaluating the performance of IPO-RT and BIS alongside objective tests.

摘要

人格组织库存-现实测试分量表(IPO-RT)和对科学的信仰量表(BIS)代表了直觉-体验和分析-理性思维的间接、代理衡量标准。然而,对因子结构的评估有限,并且没有进行人员-项目功能的评估。本研究使用验证性因素分析(CFA)和 1030 名参与者(465 名男性,565 名女性)的 Rasch 分析评估了 IPO-RT 和 BIS。相关分析显示,这两个测量值之间存在负相关关系。CFA 支持 IPO-RT 的双因素模型,该模型有四个双因素(听觉和视觉幻觉、妄想思维、社会缺陷和混乱)。BIS 最适合单因素模型。Rasch 分析表明,这两个测量值的项目/人员可靠性和单维性均令人满意,并且项目通常表现出性别不变性。然而,IPO-RT 项目具有挑战性,而 BIS 项目相对容易认可。总体而言,结果表明,IPO-RT 和 BIS 是直觉-体验和分析-理性思维的概念性合理的间接指标。考虑到这些思维方式的广泛程度,未来一个有用的研究重点包括评估 IPO-RT 和 BIS 与客观测试的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5390/11379196/fb24a2b752af/pone.0310055.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验