School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0310055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310055. eCollection 2024.
The Inventory of Personality Organization-Reality Testing Subscale (IPO-RT) and Belief in Science Scale (BIS) represent indirect, proxy measures of intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking. However, a limited appraisal of factorial structure exists, and assessment of person-item functioning has not occurred. This study assessed the IPO-RT and BIS using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis with a sample of 1030 participants (465 males, 565 females). Correlation analysis revealed a negative, moderate relationship between the measures. CFA supported a bifactorial model of the IPO-RT with four bifactors (Auditory and Visual Hallucinations, Delusional Thinking, Social Deficits, and Confusion). A one-factor model best fitted the BIS. Satisfactory item/person reliability and unidimensionality was observed for both measures using Rasch analysis, and items generally exhibited gender invariance. However, IPO-RT items were challenging, whereas BIS items were relatively easy to endorse. Overall, results indicated that the IPO-RT and BIS are conceptually sound, indirect indices of intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking. Acknowledging the breadth of these thinking styles, a useful future research focus includes evaluating the performance of IPO-RT and BIS alongside objective tests.
人格组织库存-现实测试分量表(IPO-RT)和对科学的信仰量表(BIS)代表了直觉-体验和分析-理性思维的间接、代理衡量标准。然而,对因子结构的评估有限,并且没有进行人员-项目功能的评估。本研究使用验证性因素分析(CFA)和 1030 名参与者(465 名男性,565 名女性)的 Rasch 分析评估了 IPO-RT 和 BIS。相关分析显示,这两个测量值之间存在负相关关系。CFA 支持 IPO-RT 的双因素模型,该模型有四个双因素(听觉和视觉幻觉、妄想思维、社会缺陷和混乱)。BIS 最适合单因素模型。Rasch 分析表明,这两个测量值的项目/人员可靠性和单维性均令人满意,并且项目通常表现出性别不变性。然而,IPO-RT 项目具有挑战性,而 BIS 项目相对容易认可。总体而言,结果表明,IPO-RT 和 BIS 是直觉-体验和分析-理性思维的概念性合理的间接指标。考虑到这些思维方式的广泛程度,未来一个有用的研究重点包括评估 IPO-RT 和 BIS 与客观测试的表现。