• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泌尿外科领域的期刊是否认可报告指南?对作者指南的一项调查。

Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions.

作者信息

Kunath Frank, Grobe Henrik R, Rücker Gerta, Engehausen Dirk, Antes Gerd, Wullich Bernd, Meerpohl Jörg J

机构信息

German Cochrane Centre, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg/Br., Germany. kunath @ cochrane.de

出版信息

Urol Int. 2012;88(1):54-9. doi: 10.1159/000332742. Epub 2011 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1159/000332742
PMID:22104723
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Reporting guidelines aim to ensure adequate and complete reporting of clinical studies and are an indispensable tool to translate scientific results into clinical practice. The extent to which reporting guidelines are incorporated into the author instructions of journals publishing in the field of urology remained unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed the author instructions of uro-nephrological journals indexed in 'Journal Citation Reports 2009'. Two authors independently assessed the author guidelines. We evaluated additional information including whether a journal was published by or in association with a medical association. Discrepancies were resolved by re-checking the respective author instructions and by discussion with a third author.

RESULTS

The recommendations of the International Committee of Journal Editors were endorsed by 32 journals (58.2%) but were mentioned in 12 (37.5%) only to give general advice about manuscript preparation. Fourteen journals (25.5%) mentioned at least one reporting guideline, with CONSORT the most frequently cited. Journals with high impact factors were more likely to endorse CONSORT (p < 0.009). Other reporting guidelines were mentioned by <6% of the journals.

CONCLUSION

All key stakeholders involved in the publication process should more frequently promote the awareness and use of reporting guidelines.

摘要

引言

报告指南旨在确保临床研究报告的充分性和完整性,是将科学成果转化为临床实践的不可或缺的工具。目前尚不清楚报告指南在泌尿外科领域期刊的作者指南中纳入的程度。

材料与方法

我们评估了《期刊引用报告2009》中索引的泌尿肾病学杂志的作者指南。两位作者独立评估作者指南。我们评估了其他信息,包括期刊是否由医学协会出版或与之相关联。通过重新检查各自的作者指南并与第三位作者讨论来解决分歧。

结果

32种期刊(58.2%)认可了国际医学期刊编辑委员会的建议,但只有12种期刊(37.5%)在给出关于稿件准备的一般建议时提及了这些建议。14种期刊(25.5%)提到了至少一项报告指南,其中CONSORT被引用得最为频繁。影响因子高的期刊更有可能认可CONSORT(p < 0.009)。其他报告指南被不到6%的期刊提及。

结论

出版过程中涉及的所有关键利益相关者应更频繁地提高对报告指南的认识并促进其使用。

相似文献

1
Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions.泌尿外科领域的期刊是否认可报告指南?对作者指南的一项调查。
Urol Int. 2012;88(1):54-9. doi: 10.1159/000332742. Epub 2011 Nov 19.
2
Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors.儿科期刊的编辑政策:对作者指南的调查
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Mar;164(3):268-72. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.287.
3
Promoting transparent and accurate reporting of research studies in rheumatology: endorsement of reporting guidelines in rheumatology journals.促进风湿病学研究报告的透明和准确:风湿病学期刊对报告指南的认可。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;43(2):288-91. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
4
Policies of dental journals for reporting and monitoring authorship and contributorship.牙科期刊关于报告和监测作者和贡献者的政策。
Br Dent J. 2011 Sep 9;211(5):223-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.721.
5
[Author and authorship in medical journals].[医学期刊中的作者与署名]
Neurologia. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):1-6.
6
Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions.儿科开放获取期刊是否促进了良好的出版实践?对作者说明的分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Apr 9;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-27.
7
Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal instructions to authors.随机试验中干预措施的报告:对期刊给作者的投稿指南的审核
Trials. 2014 Jan 14;15:20. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-20.
8
Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.提高韩国传统医学期刊随机对照试验报告质量的认可:一项系统评价
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:429. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.
9
The content of medical journal Instructions for authors.医学期刊投稿须知的内容。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):743-9, 749.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.028. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
10
Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: a systematic review.血液学期刊未充分遵循报告指南:系统评价。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):608-617. doi: 10.1111/jth.13637. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-sectional study on the endorsement of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration among immunology and allergy journals.一项关于免疫学和过敏学期刊对报告指南及临床试验注册认可情况的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322003. eCollection 2025.
2
High Intensity Interval Training and Arterial Hypertension: Quality of Reporting.高强度间歇训练与动脉高血压:报告质量
Sports Med Int Open. 2025 Feb 12;9:a24939466. doi: 10.1055/a-2493-9466. eCollection 2025.
3
Endorsement of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration across urological medical journals: a cross-sectional study.
泌尿外科医学期刊对报告指南和临床试验注册的认可:一项横断面研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 10;12:e18619. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18619. eCollection 2024.
4
The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study.放射学期刊中对一般和人工智能报告指南的认可:一项元研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02117-x.
5
The relationship between endorsing reporting guidelines or trial registration and the impact factor or total citations in surgical journals.认可报告指南或试验注册与外科杂志的影响因子或总被引次数之间的关系。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 25;10:e12837. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12837. eCollection 2022.
6
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017.对1987年至2017年期间分析作者指南的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 5;12(1):5840. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y.
7
Comparing the reporting and conduct quality of exercise and pharmacological randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.比较运动和药物随机对照试验的报告和实施质量:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 11;11(8):e048218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048218.
8
Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study.内分泌和内科期刊对报告指南和研究注册的认可:meta-流行病学研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e031259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031259.
9
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015.更新诊断准确性报告标准:STARD 2015的制定。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Jun 7;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7. eCollection 2016.
10
Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting.随机对照试验摘要的结构格式:对其当前使用情况及其与方法学报告的关联的横断面分析
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0469-3.