Department of Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/5, 3000 Louvain, Belgium.
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Jun;22(2):241-51. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9342-0.
The diagnosis of breast cancer increasingly implies a return-to-work (RTW) challenge as survival rates increase. RTW is regarded as a multidisciplinary process and a country's legislation affects the degree of involvement of the different stakeholders. We elucidated on bottlenecks and contributing factors and the relationship between policy and practice regarding RTW of employees with breast cancer as perceived by Belgian (Flemish) stakeholders.
Three multidisciplinary groups (n = 7, n = 9, n = 10) were interviewed during a breast cancer conference. Treating physicians (n = 4), employers (n = 6), social security physicians (n = 3), occupational physicians (n = 4), survivors (n = 5) and representatives of patient associations (n = 4) were included. The major theme was the legal and practical role in the RTW process as experienced by the participants. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to analyse stakeholders' experiences of women's RTW after breast cancer.
The stakeholders reported different perspectives. Employees focus on treatment and feel ill-informed about the RTW options. Treating physicians do not feel competent about advising on work-related questions. Employers have to balance the interests of both the business and the employee. Social security physicians assess ability to work and facilitate RTW options. Occupational physicians see opportunities but the legislation does not support their involvement. Stakeholders expressed the need for coordination and reported finding ways to accommodate the employee's needs by being flexible with the legislation to support the RTW process.
Two factors might hamper RTW for breast cancer patients: the varying stakeholder perspectives and Belgian legislation which emphasizes the patient or disability role, but not the employee role. When stakeholders are motivated they find ways to support RTW, but improved legislation could support the necessary coordination of RTW for these patients.
随着乳腺癌存活率的提高,其诊断结果越来越多地意味着员工需要重返工作岗位(RTW)。RTW 被视为一个多学科的过程,而一个国家的立法会影响不同利益相关者的参与程度。我们阐明了比利时(佛兰芒语区)利益相关者认为与乳腺癌员工 RTW 相关的瓶颈、促成因素以及政策与实践之间的关系。
在乳腺癌会议期间,对三个多学科小组(n=7、n=9、n=10)进行了访谈。纳入了治疗医生(n=4)、雇主(n=6)、社会保障医生(n=3)、职业医生(n=4)、幸存者(n=5)和患者协会代表(n=4)。主要主题是参与者在 RTW 过程中的法律和实际作用。采用定性主题分析来分析利益相关者对女性乳腺癌后 RTW 的体验。
利益相关者报告了不同的观点。员工关注治疗,对 RTW 选择感到信息不足。治疗医生不擅长提供与工作相关的问题咨询。雇主必须平衡企业和员工的利益。社会保障医生评估工作能力并促进 RTW 选择。职业医生看到了机会,但立法不支持他们的参与。利益相关者表示需要协调,并表示通过灵活运用立法来满足员工的需求,为 RTW 过程提供支持,从而找到满足员工需求的方法。
有两个因素可能会阻碍乳腺癌患者的 RTW:利益相关者的不同观点和比利时立法强调患者或残疾角色,而不是员工角色。当利益相关者受到激励时,他们会找到支持 RTW 的方法,但改进立法可以支持这些患者 RTW 所需的协调。