Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 May;17(2):327-45. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02040.x. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
To identify an evidence-based intervention to promote changes in diet and physical activity and adapt it for a UK primary care setting for people with high cardiovascular risk.
A three-stage mixed-methods design was used to facilitate a strategic approach to programme selection and adaptation.
Stage 1: Criteria for scientific quality and local appropriateness were developed for the selection/adaptation of an intervention to promote lifestyle change in people of high cardiovascular risk through (1) patient interviews, (2) a literature search to extract evidence-based criteria for behavioural interventions, and (3) stakeholder consultation. Stage 2: Potential interventions for adaptation were identified and ranked according to their performance against the criteria developed in Stage 1. Stage 3: Intervention mapping (IM) techniques were used to (1) specify the behavioural objectives that participants would need to reach in order to attain programme outcomes, and (2) adapt the selected intervention to ensure that evidence-based strategies to target all identified behavioural objectives were included.
Four of 23 potential interventions identified met the 11 essential criteria agreed by a multi-disciplinary stakeholder committee. Of these, the Greater Green Triangle programme (Laatikainen et al., 2007) was ranked highest and selected for adaptation. The IM process identified 13 additional behaviour change strategies that were used to adapt the intervention for the local context.
IM provided a useful set of techniques for the systematic adaptation of an existing lifestyle intervention to a new population and context, and facilitated transparent working processes for a multi-disciplinary team.
确定一项基于证据的干预措施,以促进饮食和身体活动的改变,并将其适应英国高心血管风险人群的初级保健环境。
采用三阶段混合方法设计,为方案选择和适应提供策略方法。
第 1 阶段:通过(1)患者访谈、(2)提取促进高心血管风险人群生活方式改变的行为干预循证标准的文献检索、(3)利益相关者咨询,制定了选择/适应促进生活方式改变的干预措施的科学质量和当地适宜性标准。第 2 阶段:根据针对第 1 阶段制定的标准的表现,确定并对潜在干预措施进行排名。第 3 阶段:使用干预映射(IM)技术(1)指定参与者为实现方案结果所需达到的行为目标,(2)适应选定的干预措施,以确保纳入针对所有确定的行为目标的基于证据的策略。
由多学科利益相关者委员会商定的 11 项基本标准,确定了 23 个潜在干预措施中的 4 个符合条件。其中,排名最高的是 Greater Green Triangle 计划(Laatikainen 等人,2007),并被选中进行适应。IM 过程确定了 13 项额外的行为改变策略,用于使干预适应当地情况。
IM 为现有生活方式干预措施在新人群和新环境中的系统适应提供了一套有用的技术,并为多学科团队提供了透明的工作流程。