• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少腰围:一项基于初级保健干预的试点随机对照试验,以支持心血管疾病高风险人群的生活方式改变。

Waste the waist: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a primary care based intervention to support lifestyle change in people with high cardiovascular risk.

作者信息

Greaves Colin, Gillison Fiona, Stathi Afroditi, Bennett Paul, Reddy Prasuna, Dunbar James, Perry Rachel, Messom Daniel, Chandler Roger, Francis Margaret, Davis Mark, Green Colin, Evans Philip, Taylor Gordon

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jan 16;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0159-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-014-0159-z
PMID:25592201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4304605/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the UK, thousands of people with high cardiovascular risk are being identified by a national risk-assessment programme (NHS Health Checks). Waste the Waist is an evidence-informed, theory-driven (modified Health Action Process Approach), group-based intervention designed to promote healthy eating and physical activity for people with high cardiovascular risk. This pilot randomised controlled trial aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering the Waste the Waist intervention in UK primary care and of conducting a full-scale randomised controlled trial. We also conducted exploratory analyses of changes in weight.

METHODS

Patients aged 40-74 with a Body Mass Index of 28 or more and high cardiovascular risk were identified from risk-assessment data or from practice database searches. Participants were randomised, using an online computerised randomisation algorithm, to receive usual care and standardised information on cardiovascular risk and lifestyle (Controls) or nine sessions of the Waste the Waist programme (Intervention). Group allocation was concealed until the point of randomisation. Thereafter, the statistician, but not participants or data collectors were blinded to group allocation. Weight, physical activity (accelerometry) and cardiovascular risk markers (blood tests) were measured at 0, 4 and 12 months.

RESULTS

108 participants (22% of those approached) were recruited (55 intervention, 53 controls) from 6 practices and 89% provided data at both 4 and 12 months. Participants had a mean age of 65 and 70% were male. Intervention participants attended 72% of group sessions. Based on last observations carried forward, the intervention group did not lose significantly more weight than controls at 12 months, although the difference was significant when co-interventions and co-morbidities that could affect weight were taken into account (Mean Diff 2.6Kg. 95%CI: -4.8 to -0.3, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found in physical activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Waste the Waist intervention is deliverable in UK primary care, has acceptable recruitment and retention rates and produces promising preliminary weight loss results. Subject to refinement of the physical activity component, it is now ready for evaluation in a full-scale trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10707899 .

摘要

背景

在英国,一项全国风险评估计划(国民健康服务健康检查)识别出了数千名心血管疾病高风险人群。“甩掉腰间赘肉”是一项基于证据、理论驱动(改良的健康行动过程方法)的群体干预措施,旨在促进心血管疾病高风险人群的健康饮食和体育锻炼。这项试点随机对照试验旨在评估在英国初级医疗保健中实施“甩掉腰间赘肉”干预措施以及开展全面随机对照试验的可行性。我们还对体重变化进行了探索性分析。

方法

从风险评估数据或实践数据库搜索中识别出年龄在40 - 74岁、体重指数为28或更高且心血管疾病风险高的患者。参与者通过在线计算机随机算法进行随机分组,分别接受常规护理以及关于心血管疾病风险和生活方式的标准化信息(对照组),或参加九节“甩掉腰间赘肉”课程(干预组)。在随机分组之前,组分配情况是保密的。此后,统计人员对组分配情况不知情,但参与者和数据收集人员知晓。在0、4和12个月时测量体重、体育活动(加速度计测量)和心血管疾病风险标志物(血液检测)。

结果

从6个医疗机构招募了108名参与者(占所接触人群的22%)(55名干预组,53名对照组),89%的参与者在4个月和12个月时都提供了数据。参与者的平均年龄为65岁,70%为男性。干预组参与者参加了72%的小组课程。根据末次观察值结转法,干预组在12个月时体重减轻并不显著多于对照组,不过在考虑可能影响体重的联合干预措施和合并症时,差异具有统计学意义(平均差值2.6千克,95%置信区间:-4.8至-0.3,p = 0.025)。在体育活动方面未发现显著差异。

结论

“甩掉腰间赘肉”干预措施在英国初级医疗保健中是可行的,招募和留存率可接受,并且产生了有前景的初步体重减轻结果。在对体育活动部分进行完善后,现在已准备好在全面试验中进行评估。

试验注册

当前受控试验ISRCTN10707899 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/1bdb06c8e592/12966_2014_159_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/a64d4b8bac2a/12966_2014_159_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/6b90dbdec087/12966_2014_159_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/1bdb06c8e592/12966_2014_159_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/a64d4b8bac2a/12966_2014_159_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/6b90dbdec087/12966_2014_159_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42b0/4304605/1bdb06c8e592/12966_2014_159_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Waste the waist: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a primary care based intervention to support lifestyle change in people with high cardiovascular risk.减少腰围:一项基于初级保健干预的试点随机对照试验,以支持心血管疾病高风险人群的生活方式改变。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jan 16;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0159-z.
2
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health', a family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention delivered in a community setting for ages 6 to 11 years.一项随机对照试验,评估“健康家庭”项目的有效性和成本效益。该项目是一种针对6至11岁儿童的基于家庭的社区肥胖治疗干预措施。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(1):1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta21010.
3
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motivational interviewing-based intervention for weight loss maintenance in adults.一项针对成年人减肥维持的基于动机性访谈干预的可行性随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(50):v-vi, xix-xxv, 1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta19500.
4
Behavioural activation to prevent depression and loneliness among socially isolated older people with long-term conditions: The BASIL COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial.针对患有长期疾病且社会隔离的老年人的行为激活以预防抑郁和孤独感:BASIL COVID-19 先导随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 12;18(10):e1003779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003779. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Enhanced motivational interviewing for reducing weight and increasing physical activity in adults with high cardiovascular risk: the MOVE IT three-arm RCT.增强型动机性访谈对降低心血管高危成年人体重和增加身体活动的效果:MOVE IT 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(69):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta23690.
6
Tackling obesity in areas of high social deprivation: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a task-based weight management group programme - a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.解决高度社会贫困地区的肥胖问题:基于任务的体重管理小组计划的临床效果和成本效益——一项随机对照试验和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(79):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta20790.
7
Structured lifestyle education to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first episode psychosis: the STEPWISE RCT.结构化生活方式教育以支持精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍和首发精神病患者减肥:STEPWISE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(65):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta22650.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Processes of behavior change and weight loss in a theory-based weight loss intervention program: a test of the process model for lifestyle behavior change.基于理论的减肥干预项目中的行为改变和体重减轻过程:生活方式行为改变过程模型的检验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jan 16;12:2. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0160-6.
10
Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.健康筛查门诊减少 NHS 员工旷工和出勤主义:eTHOS 一项试点 RCT。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(23):1-105. doi: 10.3310/KDST3869.

引用本文的文献

1
Are there inequalities in the attendance at and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? An individual participant data meta-analysis.英国针对成年人的行为体重管理干预措施在参与率和效果方面是否存在不平等现象?一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 7;3(2):e001382. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001382. eCollection 2025.
2
Determinant factors influencing stunting prevention behaviors among working mothers in West Java Province, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.印度尼西亚西爪哇省职业母亲中影响发育迟缓预防行为的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):2719. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24078-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.肥胖成年人非手术干预长期维持体重减轻:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2014 May 14;348:g2646. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2646.
2
Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults' self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review.哪些行为改变技巧在提高老年人的自我效能和身体活动行为方面最有效?一项系统综述。
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Oct;48(2):225-34. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9593-z.
3
2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society.
Patterns of physical activity in hunter-gatherer children compared with US and UK children.
与美国和英国儿童相比,狩猎采集社会儿童的身体活动模式。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):1495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81326-w.
4
Conceptual and Evidence Update on Incidental Physical Activity: A Scoping Review of Experimental and Observational Studies.偶然身体活动的概念与证据更新:实验性和观察性研究的范围综述
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025 Jan;35(1):e70015. doi: 10.1111/sms.70015.
5
The relationships among food neophobia, mediterranean diet adherence, and eating disorder risk among university students: a cross-sectional study.大学生中食物恐新症、地中海饮食依从性与饮食失调风险之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jan 15;44(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00735-3.
6
Physical Activity Interventions Framed by the Health Action Process Approach for Adults with Long-Term Conditions: A Scoping Review.健康行动过程框架下针对长期慢性病成年人的身体活动干预措施:系统评价。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Dec;31(6):987-1017. doi: 10.1007/s12529-024-10305-2. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
7
Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2022.日本动脉粥样硬化协会(JAS)2022年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防指南。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Jun 1;31(6):641-853. doi: 10.5551/jat.GL2022. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
8
Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.英国成人行为体重管理干预措施的参与度和效果是否存在差异?一项个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 23;13(3):e067607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067607.
9
A systematic review of inequalities in the uptake of, adherence to, and effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions in adults.一项系统评价成人在接受、坚持和行为体重管理干预有效性方面的不平等。
Obes Rev. 2022 Jun;23(6):e13438. doi: 10.1111/obr.13438. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
10
Physical activity, diet, and weight loss in patients recruited from primary care settings: An update on obesity management interventions.从初级保健机构招募的患者的体育活动、饮食与体重减轻:肥胖管理干预措施的最新情况
Obes Sci Pract. 2021 May 4;7(5):619-628. doi: 10.1002/osp4.514. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2013年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/肥胖学会成人超重和肥胖管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及肥胖学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2985-3023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
4
What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals' physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改变肥胖个体身体活动自我效能感和行为的最有效技术有哪些:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Mar 3;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-29.
5
Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control.动机、自我决定和长期体重控制。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Mar 2;9:22. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-22.
6
'Waste the Waist': the development of an intervention to promote changes in diet and physical activity for people with high cardiovascular risk.“浪费腰部”:为高心血管风险人群促进饮食和身体活动改变的干预措施的发展。
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 May;17(2):327-45. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02040.x. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
7
Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.运动推荐计划在初级保健中对身体活动和改善健康结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 4;343:d6462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6462.
8
Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: lighten Up randomised controlled trial.比较商业或初级保健主导的减肥项目与最小干预对照组在肥胖人群中的减肥效果:Ligten Up 随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 3;343:d6500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6500.
9
Getting out and about in older adults: the nature of daily trips and their association with objectively assessed physical activity.老年人的外出活动:日常出行的性质及其与客观评估的身体活动的关系。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 21;8:116. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-116.
10
Primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment versus standard care: a randomised controlled trial.初级保健向商业供应商转介进行减肥治疗与标准护理相比:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Oct 22;378(9801):1485-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61344-5. Epub 2011 Sep 7.