Saboya Patrícia Pozas, Bodanese Luiz Carlos, Zimmermann Paulo Roberto, Gustavo Andreia da Silva, Macagnan Fabricio Edler, Feoli Ana Pandolfo, Oliveira Margareth da Silva
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017 Jan;108(1):60-69. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160186. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
Lifestyle intervention programs can reduce the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and, therefore, reduce the risk for cardiac disease, one of the main public health problems nowadays.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three types of approach for lifestyle change programs in the reduction of metabolic parameters, and to identify its impact on the quality of life (QOL) of individuals with MetS.
A randomized controlled trial included 72 individuals with MetS aged 30-59 years. Individuals were randomized into three groups of multidisciplinary intervention [Standard Intervention (SI) - control group; Group Intervention (GI); and Individual Intervention (II)] during 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the metabolic parameters, and secondarily, the improvement in QOL measures at three moments: baseline, 3 and 9 months.
Group and individual interventions resulted in a significant reduction in body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure at 3 months and the improvement of QOL, although it was significantly associated with the physical functioning domain. However, these changes did not remain 6 months after the end of intervention. Depression and anxiety were significantly associated with worse QOL, although they showed no effect on the response to intervention.
Multidisciplinary intervention, especially in a group, might be an effective and economically feasible strategy in the control of metabolic parameters of MetS and improvement of QOL compared to SI, even in a dose-effect relationship.
生活方式干预项目可以降低代谢综合征(MetS)的患病率,从而降低心脏病风险,而心脏病是当今主要的公共卫生问题之一。
本研究旨在比较三种生活方式改变项目方法在降低代谢参数方面的效果,并确定其对患有MetS个体生活质量(QOL)的影响。
一项随机对照试验纳入了72名年龄在30 - 59岁的MetS患者。个体被随机分为三组,进行为期12周的多学科干预[标准干预(SI)——对照组;小组干预(GI);以及个体干预(II)]。主要结局是代谢参数的变化,次要结局是在三个时间点(基线、3个月和9个月)生活质量测量指标的改善情况。
小组干预和个体干预在3个月时导致体重指数、腰围、收缩压显著降低,生活质量得到改善,尽管这与身体功能领域显著相关。然而,这些变化在干预结束6个月后并未持续存在。抑郁和焦虑与较差的生活质量显著相关,尽管它们对干预反应没有影响。
与标准干预相比,多学科干预,尤其是小组干预,可能是控制MetS代谢参数和改善生活质量的一种有效且经济可行的策略,甚至存在剂量 - 效应关系。