Suppr超能文献

精神卫生治疗中的共同决策:利益相关者焦点小组的定性研究结果。

Shared decision making in mental health treatment: qualitative findings from stakeholder focus groups.

机构信息

UVA School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22903-3388, USA.

出版信息

Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Dec;25(6):e27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This article reports on findings from seven stakeholder focus groups conducted in exploring shared decision making (SDM) between provider and consumer in mental health (MH) treatment in public MH.

BASIC PROCEDURES

Seven focus groups were conducted with stakeholders-consumers, family members, prescribers, MH clinicians, and rural providers. Each of the focus groups was recorded digitally, transcribed into text, and analyzed qualitatively for recurring themes.

MAIN FINDINGS

Provider barriers to SDM include history of the medical model, MH crises, lack of system support, and time. Consumer-related barriers included consumer competency, fears, insight, literacy, and trauma from past experiences. Information-exchange issues include consumer passivity, whether consumers could be viewed as experts, and importance of adequate history information. New skills needed to practice SDM included provider's knowledge about alternative treatments, mastery of person-first language, and listening skills; consumer's ability to articulate their expert information; and computer skills for both providers and consumers. Outcomes expected from practice of SDM include greater sharing of power between provider and consumer, greater follow-through with treatment plans, greater self-management on the part of consumers, and improved therapeutic alliances.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Implementing SDM in public MH will impact consumers and their families, providers, prescribers, and administrators. More SDM trials in public MH are needed to answer some of the many questions that remain.

摘要

目的

本文报告了在公共心理健康治疗中探索提供者和消费者之间共享决策(SDM)的七项利益相关者焦点小组研究结果。

基本程序

与利益相关者——消费者、家庭成员、处方者、心理健康临床医生和农村提供者进行了七次焦点小组。每个焦点小组都进行了数字记录、转录成文本,并进行了定性分析以找出反复出现的主题。

主要发现

提供者实施 SDM 的障碍包括医学模式的历史、心理健康危机、缺乏系统支持和时间。与消费者相关的障碍包括消费者能力、恐惧、洞察力、读写能力和过去经历的创伤。信息交流问题包括消费者的被动性、是否可以将消费者视为专家以及充分了解病史信息的重要性。实践 SDM 所需的新技能包括提供者对替代治疗方法的了解、掌握以人为本的语言以及倾听技巧;消费者表达其专业信息的能力;以及提供者和消费者的计算机技能。实践 SDM 预期的结果包括提供者和消费者之间权力的更大共享、治疗计划的更好执行、消费者的更好自我管理以及改善治疗联盟。

主要结论

在公共心理健康中实施 SDM 将影响消费者及其家庭、提供者、处方者和管理人员。需要在公共心理健康中进行更多的 SDM 试验来回答一些仍然存在的许多问题。

相似文献

7
Decision making in recovery-oriented mental health care.康复导向的精神卫生保健中的决策。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012 Spring;35(4):305-14. doi: 10.2975/35.4.2012.305.314.

引用本文的文献

5
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Pushing the envelope: shared decision making in mental health.推陈出新:心理健康中的共同决策。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Summer;34(1):14-22. doi: 10.2975/34.1.2010.14.22.
4
Shared decision making and serious mental illness.共同决策与严重精神疾病
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2008 Dec;22(6):334-43. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
8
Family work in first-onset psychosis: a literature review.首发精神病中的家庭作用:文献综述
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Jun;14(4):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01093.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验