UK Biochar Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, United Kingdom.
Waste Manag. 2012 May;32(5):859-68. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
A life cycle assessment (LCA) focused on biochar and bioenergy generation was performed for three thermal treatment configurations (slow pyrolysis, fast pyrolysis and gasification). Ten UK biodegradable wastes or residues were considered as feedstocks in this study. Carbon (equivalent) abatement (CA) and electricity production indicators were calculated. Slow pyrolysis systems offer the best performance in terms of CA, with net results varying from 0.07 to 1.25tonnes of CO(2)eq.t(-1) of feedstock treated. On the other hand, gasification achieves the best electricity generation outputs, with results varying around 0.9MWhet(-1) of feedstock. Moreover, selection of a common waste treatment practice as the reference scenario in an LCA has to be undertaken carefully as this will have a key influence upon the CA performance of pyrolysis or gasification biochar systems (P/GBS). Results suggest that P/GBS could produce important environmental benefits in terms of CA, but several potential pollution issues arising from contaminants in the biochar have to be addressed before biochar and bioenergy production from biodegradable waste can become common practice.
针对三种热解处理配置(慢速热解、快速热解和气化)进行了以生物炭和生物能源生产为重点的生命周期评估(LCA)。在这项研究中,考虑了十种英国可生物降解废物或残渣作为原料。计算了碳(当量)减排(CA)和电力生产指标。就 CA 而言,慢速热解系统的性能最佳,处理的每吨原料的净结果在 0.07 到 1.25 吨 CO(2)eq.t(-1)之间。另一方面,气化可实现最佳的发电输出,结果约为 0.9MWhet(-1)的原料。此外,在 LCA 中选择常见的废物处理实践作为参考情景必须谨慎进行,因为这将对热解或气化生物炭系统(P/GBS)的 CA 性能产生关键影响。结果表明,P/GBS 在 CA 方面可能会产生重要的环境效益,但在可生物降解废物的生物炭和生物能源生产变得普遍之前,必须解决生物炭中污染物引起的几个潜在污染问题。